MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W139609053

Music Therapy Research

2006· article· en· W139609053 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian journal of music therapy · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueMusic Therapy and Health
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésReading (process)Section (typography)MusicologyLibrary scienceVisual artsHistoryPsychologyComputer scienceArtPolitical scienceLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Wheeler, Barbara L., Ed. (2005). Music Research. second Edition. Gilsum, NH: Barcelona Publishers.My personal copy of the first edition of the Music book is dog-eared and ruined. I used it through my own PhD dissertation and as a reference during dozens of research courses. Since then, various students of mine in Finland and Canada have used that edition as well.It was on summer 2003 at the European Music Conference in Jyvaskyla, Finland when Dr. Wheeler presented the contents of the second edition of the book. I eagerly looked forward to that new edition and now after reading it, I must say it was worth the wait. The book's 586 pages provide evidence that music therapy has stepped into the research century.The structure of the book consists of four parts, with each section covering a different aspect of research. Part one introduces an overview of music therapy research issues. Part two introduces the research process, discussing the different phases from beginning to end. Part three presents the types of quantitative research, and part four discusses other types of research, such as general music research, philosophical inquiry, developing theory, and historical research. The contributors of the book are all well known qualitative or quantitative music therapy researchers from all over the world. I hope that many Canadian music therapists find this book and allow it to encourage and guide them to start research projects.In the following review I will focus on introducing those chapters of the book that might be especially helpful for a music therapist planning to do a qualitative analysis of his of her own clinical work. Even if you do not understand the research concepts you can simply start reading - and learning - about those concepts step by step. It has been written in such a way that it serves as a stand-alone reference - you really do not need many other research books to start the career of the researcher. I am using this book as a main course material during my MMT research courses.Any music therapist interested in doing any kind of research should start by reading chapter I, Overview of Music in which Dr. Barbara L. Wheeler defines music therapy research and gives clear definitions of the differences, relationships and integration between research, practice and theory. In Chapter 3 Dr. Even Ruud provides clear definitions of research terms commonly used in philosophy and theory of science, such as epistemology, ontology, axilogy, and paradigm. These chapters provide beginning researchers with the methodological basis needed to start their research projects.Chapter 7, Research Topics and Questions in Music Therapy by Dr. Kenneth E. Bruscia provides an overview of the vast array of topics and questions that can be pursued in music therapy research, with three broad topical areas identified: discipline, profession, and foundation. interests appropriate for both qualitative and quantitative research are also presented, and prototypical questions are identified for each type of topical area and research. This chapter is extremely clear and easy to read. Beginner researchers can define whether or not his or her study is under these research topics, and whether or not it is considered assessment, treatment or evaluative research. The researcher can also use this chapter to help decide upon the focus point of his or her research. Quantitative and qualitative research approaches are clearly presented and compared, and using this chapter as a guide would bring credibility to the methodology section of any research report. I think that this chapter really is a must for every music therapy researcher. Holistic description, theory building, artistic re-creation and self-reflection are all investigated through questions concerning events, actions, interactions, experiences, language, artworks, and persons. As these levels progress, they move from description to more profound levels of interpretation. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,262
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,970

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0310,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,210
Tête enseignante GPT0,395
Écart entre enseignants0,185 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle