MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W13964861

The Child-Fat Problem.

2003· article· en· W13964861 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mary Eberstadt

Notice bibliographique

RevuePolicy review · 2003
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOverweightObesityMedicineImmigrationGerontologyPsychologyLawPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

JUST THREE MONTHS ago, a major study published in the Journal of the American Medical Association confirmed what any American with eyes even half-open could already have reported--that not only our adults, but also our children, are fat and getting fatter all the time. As the Department of Health and Human Services put it in a summary of this latest study's evidence, Among children and teens ages 6 to 19, 15 percent (almost 9 million) are overweight according to the 1999-2000 data, or triple what the proportion was in 1980. widespread media attention given to this bad-news story would appear to be justified, for the JAMA study followed at least two other blue-chip examinations during the past year or so of the underage fat explosion. One of these, a report on the whopping economic costs of child and obesity, was published in Pediatrics magazine by researchers for the Centers for Disease Control (CDC). other publication was a less prominent but also intriguing report in the May issue of the Journal of Nutrition written by researchers at the University of North Carolina. This one emphasized one of the lesser-known aspects of the fat problem--that adolescent obesity increases significantly among second- and third-generation immigrants to the United in the words of a UNG press release. This is not to say that underage corpulence is unique to Americans and their offspring--far from it. Misconceptions and undeserved reputations to the contrary most other advanced countries (and for that matter, a number of not-so-advanced ones) do indeed share in the child-fat-and-obesity problem, for the most part differing from us in degree rather than kind. In England, reported the Guardian earlier this year, Adult obesity rates have tripled and those in children have doubled since 1982. In Canada, says the Globe and Mail, also in 2002, More than a third of Canadian children aged 2 to 11 are overweight, and half that number are obese, according to newly published Statistics data. Moreover, Canada now more fat children than fat adults. As for Australia, a 2000 study there found that children of either sex were twice as likely to be defined as overweight in 2000 as in 1985. Nor is the Anglo-speaking world the only one with a child-fat problem. Its svelte reputation quite aside, for example, continental Europe and its children are ballooning as well. In report researchers for the Bollettino Epidemiologico Nazionale, Neapolitan children were more at risk of obesity than were children from Holland, the United States, and also than children living in Milan in northern Italy, while in the province of Benevento, The prevalence of overweight and obesity was greater... than in England, Scotland, and the United States. In Germany, according to researchers in the International Journal of Obesity, a large study on all children entering school in Bavaria in 1997 shows patterns of overweight and obesity which are comparable with other European data (though still lower than us and Australian data). Even vaunted if the French National Institute of Health and Medical Research is to be believed, admits an obesity problem among 10-year-olds of epidemic proportions. The number of seriously overweight children in France, reports the same institute, has more than doubled since the 1980's. Yet even granting the ambiguous relief of knowing that we are not the only giants pounding the earth, there is still no denying that the world's sole remaining superpower is also its most supersized. We Americans are remarkably catholic in this fat problem of ours--and, the nod to egalitarianism aside, our universalism here works to just about everyone's detriment. fact that we fatten up even our immigrants, several subsets of whom are measurably bigger here than are counterparts in their home countries, means that we are virtually guaranteed a steadily growing quotient of bigger and bigger people, with an unhealthy degree of heaviness becoming ever more the unremarkable norm. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,049
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,163

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,002
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0490,011

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,308 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations10
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePolicy reviewMême sujetObesity, Physical Activity, DietTravaux en français237 207