Brian Russell Graham. the Necessary Unity of Opposites: The Dialectical Thinking of Northrop Frye
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Brian Russell Graham. The Necessary Unity of Opposites: The Dialectical Thinking of Northrop Frye. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2011, xvi + 137 pp. The recent resurgence of interest in Northrop Frye, sparked in part by ongoing publication of Collected Works by University of Toronto, has worked to reestablish Frye's relevance to contemporary criticism. Aside from work of a handful of dedicated scholars, Frye's work had fallen to wayside either because his work on myth has been considered anachronistic or because his disinterest in criticism has been considered regressive or simplistic. Brian Russell Graham's new book, The Necessary Unity of Opposites: The Dialectical Thinking of Northrop Frye, contributes to this increase in interest and argues that Frye's thought is unified by a dialecticism heavily influenced by William Blake's Orc/Urizen cycle. The introduction presents Graham's goal of demonstrating suprahistorical and post-partisan nature of Frye's thought. While critics such as Robert Denham and Satra Toth have turned their attention to Frye's concept of interpenetration that appears in his notebooks--a concept that bears some similarity to Blakean dialectic--Graham instead relies on Frye's published work to demonstrate dialectical approach that characterizes his thought process. Throughout introduction Graham stresses importance of dialectic to Frye's thought, that when faced with conflicting terms Frye's thought moves dialectically beyond level of opposition onto a level where seemingly antithetical modes of thought prove to be complementary (6). The spatial metaphor of resolution on a separate, higher level also aligns with Frye's invocation of Apocalyptic world as space of revelation. Ultimately, it is this ability to move beyond simple conflicts and to see inherent unity of opposed concepts that permits Frye's insights into literature, education, and a great variety of social questions. In second chapter Mandarin and Rebel: Frye's Dialectical Secular Thinking, Graham establishes structure he will use throughout book. Each chapter presents opposing terms and supplies evidence from Frye's writing to show inadequacy of either of terms and need to transcend opposition. In second chapter, for example, Graham touts Frye's exceptionalism by citing his of such dead ends as either radical or reactionary politics (18). For Graham, Frye follows a middle path that facilitates a broader, truer perspective. This method is surprisingly effective, and reading this slim volume reader continually finds parallels between Frye's various modes of thought. Graham strengthens this structure through his invocation of Blake's Orc/Urizen cycle, likening opposition to the cyclical nature of human history (20). This chapter corrects false assumption that Frye's seeming disinterest in partisan politics was rooted in his own apoliticism. Rather, Graham argues that Frye assiduously avoided political dead ends by refusing to succumb to partisan bickering. Post-partisan Frye acknowledges importance of conflict as a part of politics but remains above controversy. As Graham presents it, Frye's dialectical thought is purged of association with marxist dialectical criticism through this avoidance of engagement. Chapters 3 and 4 take up opposition of beauty and truth in regard to Blake's poetry and secular literature, respectively. Graham continues his case for centrality of Blake's influence on Frye, building on Orc and Urizen metaphor of irresolvable conflict to include Los, spirit of work which separates two, and Ulro, a cosmological counter to Eden (27-30). The expansion of this metaphor solidifies work of mediation that must take place between dialectically opposed pairs. The second of these paired chapters defines Frye's place in world of literary criticism. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle