MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W14082143

Solutions follow perceptions: NBIC and the concept of health, medicine, disability and disease.

2004· article· en· W14082143 sur OpenAlexaff
Gregor Wolbring

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBiotechnology and Related Fields
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPerceptionInterdependenceBiomedicineSociologyPsychologyPublic relationsPolitical scienceSocial science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Nanotechnology, the art of manipulating materials on an atomic or molecular scale, (1) enables a new paradigm of science and technology that sees different technologies converging at the nanoscale, namely (a) nanoscience and nanotechnology; (b) biotechnology and biomedicine; (c) information technology; and (d) cognitive science (NBIC (nano-bio-info-cogno)). This paradigm derives from the fact that living systems are governed by molecular behavior at the nanometer scale, where chemistry, physics, biology, and computer science all now converge. The National Nanotech Initiative (US) envisions applications for the converging of NBIC in areas such as the environment, energy, water, weapons and other military applications, globalization, agriculture and health (more efficient diagnostics and genetic testing; cognitive enhancement; life extension; enhancing human performances in general), (2) each of which comes with its own sales pitches, social consequences, problems and implications. This paper will look at the area of NBIC-medicine and its relationship to disabled people. NBIC - Health, Disabled People and Improving Human Life do we want from NBIC? How do advances in NBIC change and influence our self-perception, our self-identity, the quality of our lives and our ability to pursue 'the good life'? Answering these questions requires an examination of the complex interdependent fabric of perceptions, values and choices within different cultural, economic, ethical, spiritual and moral frameworks. In the case of NBIC-medicine it is important to investigate the understanding that society and individuals have of the concept of health and disease. Furthermore, as so-called disabled people are often highlighted as the beneficiaries of NBIC-medicine products, we have to ask ourselves what perception of disabled people and what concept of disability, a concept more contentious than is commonly recognized, guides NBIC research and development, and what role disabled people are playing in this process. What Is Health? What Is a Disease? What Methods to Use to Remedy the Situation? Three main models for health and disease (the medical, the social and the transhumanist) can be identified. Within the medical model of health and disease, health is characterized as the normative functioning of biological systems, and disease is seen as the sub-normative functioning of biological systems. Medical interventions on the level of the individual are seen as the remedy of choice. On a global scale, the disability-adjusted life year (DALY) has emerged as a new measure of the burden of disease. However, it becomes increasingly clear that the DALY concept that is so far based on the purely medical model of health and disease is flawed. DALY treats, for example, paraplegia in developed and developing countries the same, independent of societal parameters. In developed countries many people with paraplegia have wheelchairs and the loss of mobility is therefore reduced. In developing countries many do not have wheelchairs, and their mobility is severely restricted. Furthermore, wheelchairs alone are of no use unless the environment is designed to cater to them. So the provision of a wheelchair in one context would not have the same effect that it would have in another. It seems we need an additional model or a broader understanding of the concepts of health and disease. The social model of health and disease still follows the sub-normative functioning of a person, but it differs from the medical model by questioning the exclusive focus on medical remedies of individuals. According to the Jakarta Declaration on Leading Health Promotion into the 21st Century, (3) pre-requisites for health are peace, shelter, education, social security, social relations, food, income, empowerment of women, a stable eco-system, sustainable resource use, social justice, respect for human rights and equity. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: Théorique ou conceptuel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,042

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,033
Communication savante0,0080,016
Science ouverte0,0010,008
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,229 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations18
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMedMême sujetBiotechnology and Related FieldsTravaux en français237 207