Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Believe in life! Always human beings will live and progress to greater, broader, and fuller life.- W. E. B. Du Bois Over a century ago in February 1905, thirty-two Americans met secretly in the Buffalo home of Mary B. Talbert to discuss the resolutions that would become the Movement. This group invited fifty-nine selected African American businessmen to a meeting that summer in western New York. On July 11 thru 14, 1905 on the Canadian side of Falls, twenty-nine met and formed a group called the (Founders of the Movement at Falls.). name Niagara allegedly came from the location of the meeting, along with the 'mighty current' of protest they wished to unleash. But before looking at the Movement, we need to take a closer look at some of the founding members. W. E. B. Du Bois is arguably the most well-known and respected founding member of the Movement. Du Bois was born in Barrington, Massachusetts in 1868. He completed high school and then went to Fisk University, where, in 1888, he received a B.A. degree. Du Bois went on to go to Harvard where he obtained his M.A. and his Ph. D. (Dubois Obituary). Du Bois was the first American to earn a Ph. D. at Harvard (Meier, and Franklin, 65). Du Bois used his training in social sciences and published the first in-depth case study of a black community in the United States, in Philadelphia Negro, in 1899. When dealing with civil rights for Americans, Du Bois believed in a college-educated Tenth. This Talented Tenth were going to be the educated Americans who would lead the rest of the Americans to equality by being committed to the welfare of the black masses. This Talented Tenth would be the leadership that would elevate the blacks economically and culturally. This will play in later to the conflict between Du Bois and the largest black figure of this time, Booker T. Washington. [Du Bois was also a noted propagandist]. Since Du Bois was the leading intellectual American at this time, it seems appropriate that this would be one of his roles. Du Bois even wrote in his autobiographical book, Dusk of Dawn, that it was his role as a master of propaganda (Meier and Franklin, 63-66). Du Bois also had a personal platform, which he circulated, that would heavily influence the Movement's platform that will be discussed later on. Du Bois' personal platform was as follows: Full political rights on the same terms as other Americans; higher education of selected Negro youth; industrial education for the masses; common school training for every Negro child; a stoppage to the campaign of self-depreciation; a careful study of the real conditions of the Negro; a national Negro periodical; the raising of a defense fund; a judicious fight in the courts for civil rights. (Meier and Franklin, 67) It is apparent in this platform that Du Bois was an intellectual, who valued an education and the advancement of Americans, unlike Booker T. Washington who was considered to be a compromiser. The Movement, whose tiny membership was drawn chiefly from the ranks of northern college-educated professional men, held annual meetings for the next five years. chief function of these gatherings was to issue declarations of protest to white America (Meier and Franklin, 68). We can see from this statement that Du Bois' feelings about educated Americans leading the way to true freedom was incorporated into the Movement. It is undeniable that Du Bois was the most influential member of the Movement. Three other important members of the Movement were; Freeman Murray, Monroe Trotter, and Ida B. Wells-Barnett. Murray moved from his Ohio home to Washington D.C. to take a federal job in the Surgeon General's office after he passed the first civil service exam that was ever administered by the United States. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».