A Mandala Browser User Study: Visualizing XML Versions of Shakespeare's Plays
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ABSTRACT We report the results of a small user study of a visual XML browsing prototype, called the Mandala browser, where dots representing entire documents or portions of documents are plotted around the periphery of a circle and drawn inward by colored magnets that are assigned values by the user. The result is akin to a Venn diagram that provides a visual representation of the interaction between multiple Boolean queries. In this study, eleven participants were given a pre-study interview, then asked to carry out a series of tasks where the dots represented speeches in plays by Shakespeare and finally were debriefed in a concluding interview. We gained from this study a range of valuable insights into how details of the Mandala browser design could be improved. Participants mentioned, for instance, that they would like to retain a connection between results and the visualizations that produced them, that they would like to be able to make notes on result sets, and that they would like to be able to save subsets within results. They also asked for tools that support collaborative searching, as well as for federated searching across collections. The user feedback confirmed the potential value of the Mandala interface and provided guidance for the next iteration of development. (ProQuest: ... denotes obscured text omitted.) INTRODUCTION Browsing interfaces are intended for people interested -fn gajmng some understanding of the contents of a collection, or in some cases pftflftse results from an initial search retrieval. Browsing interfaces can therefore be seen as having a complementary relationship with retrieval interfaces, where the goal is to obtain a retrieval target. A typical approach to information browsing is to provide the user with a list of documents, which may be ordered according to some convention such as alphabetically by author or title, or chronologically by date of publication (sometimes called faceted browsing). A more visually complex approach is to organize documents in nested tiles where relevant information is expressed through the position, dimension and appearance of each tile (Schneiderman, 1992). Yet another approach is the Scatter/Gather browser proposed by Pirolli et al. (1996), who developed a prototype visualization where documents were represented by dots that could be grouped and subsetted dynamically by the user. The literature includes a wide variety of examples of visually compelling browsing interfaces, including Small (1996) who proposed a 3D prospect view for browsing texts of Shakespeare's plays and Bederson (2001), who described asystemfororganizingthumbnailsof images. More recently, designers working with public APIs (programmatic interfaces) from social networking sites like www.flickr.com have developed a number of browsing interfaces that extend Bederson's ideas through tools suchas the color picker by Bumgardner (2005). Another example is the orbiting globes of information at http://dartdesign.de/, which allow the user to browse a constellation of moving representations that rotate under user control. The various crystal-based displays by Spoerri (2007) provide still further examples, and the 'dust & magnet' project by Yi et al. (2005) shows an inventive and interactive use of the magnet metaphor. In the context of rich-prospect browsing (Ruecker 2003), each of these interfaces includes some degree of meaningful representation, coupled with the provision of tools for manipulatingthe display. Browsing interfaces can also be used for studying parts of individual documents, such as the speeches in a play. In addition to the discussion of browsing interfaces and their features, the literature also includes discussion of the methods of evaluation. For instance, Plaisant (2004) suggests the need for new and more comprehensive strategies for evaluating the success of browsing interface designs. While most browsing interfaces provide both some representation of individual items and tools for manipulating the display, not all are concerned with the structural arrangement of the items (word clouds created at Wordle. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle