MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1451587779 · doi:10.1093/pch/17.8.440

Personal reflections on end-of-life care in a newborn infant

2012· article· en· W1451587779 sur OpenAlexaff
Michelle Ryan

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicinePediatricsPsychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I started medical school three months pregnant with my second child. Within two months, at 24 weeks and 5 days’ gestation, my membranes ruptured and I went into labour. A decision had to be made quickly about whether to proceed with a classical Caesarean section, potentially compromising my future ability to carry to term, and be aggressive with the medical care in an attempt to save our infant who, we were told, only had a 30% chance of survival. My husband and I reasoned we had this baby now, so we asked that aggressive measures be taken. Within the hour, our little Josiah was born – all 750 g of him. By day 2, he was experiencing seizures, required blood transfusions, and his head ultrasound revealed Grade 3 and 4 hemorrhages. We were advised to take him off the ventilator. Our questions of what his future would hold were met with unclear answers. Without a clear understanding of his future quality of life, we prayed God would heal and help him, hoped for the best and decided to let Josiah continue to fight. The next five weeks were a roller coaster of emotions that carried us through countless blood, platelet and plasma transfusions, a laparotomy and a bowel resection. Emotionally, mentally and physically, the stress is draining for parents who are constantly on edge, wondering if the phone ringing will bring more bad news. A few days following his surgery, we were again asked to extubate him. He appeared to be recovering well, but the subsequent head ultrasound appeared worse. This can be extremely confusing for parents. Our child evidently was a fighter, the physicians willingly performed the surgery, but then they ask you to let him die. As someone in medicine, I had some comprehension of his medical status. I was shown the ultrasound images, given the daily bloodwork results and believed I was part of his management team. I understood their rationale for asking us to extubate because his future quality of life would be poor. What the physicians failed to understand is that they were trying to appeal to my rational side, but for those five weeks I was Josiah’s mother, still hoping to bring him home one day. To wear both hats at the same time is impossible. We decided to fight alongside him. Over that next few days, he quickly deteriorated. We were told, “He’s dying. There is nothing more we can do.” We knew our son well by then and saw he was tired. The deliberation between my husband and I was short and we elected to take him off the ventilator. We were a family now – father, mother and dying child. No incubators, masks, or lines separated us any longer. I held his tiny frame, which should still be in utero, against me. Within 45 min, our beautiful son died peacefully in my arms, in warmth and surrounded by love. His death overturned our lives. There was a void of unmet love and unfulfilled moments that trailed us like a shadow. Five years later, we continue to miss him, but much of our healing came from knowing we fought along with him, and in the end, respected his wishes; we also spent our last moments together, instead of watching him go lifeless through an unfeeling plastic incubator. Our decision to not extubate him earlier was irrational to others, but I live without regret. Because I had some medical knowledge and was the only consistent person by his side since his birth, I believed I was able to better advocate for him, and that my voice and opinions were ultimately respected. From this ordeal, I have gained the following insights: Communicate with parents on a daily basis, even by phone, so the parents truly understand and stay abreast of the developments and gravity of their child’s conditions. If possible, have the information relayed by the same person so a trusting alliance can be formed. When approaching a parent about palliation or a do-not-resuscitate order, do it in a comfortable, nonthreatening environment, with only a few key people, including the child’s primary nurse, if available. For us, there were four residents and physicians with my husband and I in an interview room. There is a need for privacy, but I felt unprepared for so many people arguing their point of view for palliation and became defensive. To me, it gave the impression we were no longer a cohesive team. When relaying why you feel a do-not-resuscitate order/end-of-life procedure should be enacted, use clear, basic language to allow parents to make a fully informed decision. If you know the child will have a short lifespan, tell them you would rather their child die with love rather than having their chest compressed. Parents will latch on to even a small, unrealistic hope, if one is inadvertently offered. Let the parents know you are also there to advocate for their child, just as they are. Together, you are a team. Give your opinion. Making the parents feel as if they have to make this decision on their own will only push them to resist the idea of palliation for fear it is the wrong choice. If the parents do decide to remove the life support, allow them time to be alone with their child. Ask all relatives to leave for even a short period of time to allow the parents to grieve in private. Parents often do not have the strength to do this by themselves. As the physician, come in and ask to hold their child. By cradling their child, as they had, demonstrates they were someone you valued and cared for as well. If you feel like crying, shed a tear with the parents. The positive impact this has on the parents is tremendous and will help them heal. If time permits and the parents ask, attend the funeral. If the parents reject palliation, respect their decision, but encourage them to spend as much time as possible with their child, so they will know when their child is deteriorating. If that time comes, ask them to respect their child’s wishes. This is often not something that needs to be done immediately, but it is important to start the dialogue. Unless the parents come ready to start palliation, ask them to go home to discuss it together and then come back with questions. Above all, remember this is a decision the parents have to always live with. Having to bury your child tortures your soul. If the parents feel pressured into the decision, even if unintentionally, it will have a lifelong negative impact from which they may never fully recover. I thank Dr Hilary Whyte and Ms Lori Ives-Baine for their invaluable input and support as well as my spouse, Dale Lynch, for fighting along with me.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,011
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,044

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,019
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0110,007
Communication savante0,0050,005
Science ouverte0,0020,006
Intégrité de la recherche0,0090,024
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,055
Tête enseignante GPT0,397
Écart entre enseignants0,343 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child Health→Même sujetEthics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare→Travaux en français237 207→