MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W146624514

Age determination of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua): 2012 Workshop between Canada and France on cod otoliths. Final report of the project SALMOCODAGE

2012· article· en· W146624514 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kelig Mahé, P. Schwab, Herlé Goraguer

Notice bibliographique

RevueInstitutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueMarine and fisheries research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGadusFisheryAtlantic codChristian ministryMarine researchGeographyFish stockOtolithOceanographyStock assessmentFish <Actinopterygii>Political scienceGeologyBiologyFishing
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

France and Canada have been working closely together for numerous years under the governance of The Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organisation (NAFO) that regulates fisheries in the Northwest Atlantic. This workshop was the first step to achieve greater agreement in the estimation of age from calcified pieces between the scientific experts from those 2 countries. The goal of this project is to realize a calibration of the estimation of ages from cod (Gadus morhua) between France and Canada in order to optimize the precision of the data supplied by those countries for stock assessment purposes. There has been in the past an internal workshop for Atlantic Canada in 1997 on ageing fish and numerous workshops for Northeast Atlantic, more precisely for the Baltic and North sea under the governance of the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES). This workshop has been organized in St-Pierre et Miquelon from 10 to 14 September 2012 and regrouped 6 scientists from IFREMER (France) and the Department of Fisheries and Oceans (DFO). This meeting was subsidized by the Ministry of Overseas (France) and the Territorial Council of St-Pierre et Miquelon. Prior to this workshop a sample of 451 otoliths and otolith images has been interpreted independently by 3 French and 3 Canadian readers. The sample consisted of 2 samples from the 3Ps NAFO area (Research survey and commercial) and 1 sample from the 3Pn, 4RS NAFO area (from various sources). Two different methods were used to age the otoliths, one using images from sliced otoliths (France) and one using broken (or cut) otoliths (Canada). Both methods used transmitted light. Results from the different sets of calcified pieces showed some differences. The set of cod otoliths from research vessel in 3Ps presented the higher percentage agreement (83%). Of the 236 otoliths, 112 were read with 100% agreement (47.5%). Modal age ot hese fish was comprised between 1 and 13 years with the mean at 4 years. The second set with high percent agreement was composed by cod otoliths from commercial vessels of the same area (3Ps) (71.7%). Of the 115 otoliths, 24 were read with 100% percentage agreement (21%). These fish were older than those from the research vessel. The mean modal age was 6 years (range from 4 to 11). The other set of cod otoliths showed a percentage agreement of 69%. This set was composed of fish both commercial and research vessels from the 3Pn, 4RS area. Of the 100 otoliths, only 7 were read with 100% percentage agreement (7%). Difference in precision could be due to the number of readers (8 for set 3 and only 4 for set 1), the composition of the samples (set 1 was composed of fish younger than other sets) and also of the sampling area. During this workshop it has been be noted that there was certainty of bias among readings from the 3 sets of cod otoliths. Moreover, there is certainty of bias between 2 readings from different methods from the same reader (example: readers 1 and 2 of the set from commercial and research vessels coming from the 3Pn, 4RS areas). The position of the first ring was identified as an important source of bias. Some measurements were taken on otolith images with 100% agreement from TNPC software\nin order to determine distances between nucleus and the settling check, and also from the nucleus to the two first growth rings. Distance analysis will provide tools to identify mismatches between readings and/or readers. The second important source of bias was the difference in the edge interpretation during July and August. When Canadian readers identify the edge with small opaque zone (which is not continuous around the edge), then the last translucent ring is considered as growth ring. In contrary, for the French readers, it is not a growth ring. Ages assigned by the Canadian personnel are generally one year greater than those of participants from France for those months. Therefore, in order to reduce those biases, a guideline on reading methods was presented and a database of reference otolith images was started (where 100% agreement was reached).\nThis first Franco-Canadian meeting on age estimation has identified sources of biases and helped to reduce them. It also produced reference documents common to France and Canada for cod in the Northwest Atlantic. However some differences persist, mainly on the otoliths sampled in July and August and this could be part of future studies.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,015
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,212
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,425

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0150,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,002
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,088
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInstitutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea)Même sujetMarine and fisheries researchTravaux en français237 207