Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Paediatric therapy practice must continually evolve as new evidence becomes available to guide clinicians working with children with disabilities. For many paediatric therapists, returning to the basics of motor control can prove most helpful in guiding clinical practice. Movement Sciences: Transfer of Knowledge into Pediatric Therapy Practice focuses on the translation of academic research pertaining to movement sciences into information that can be applied in paediatric therapy clinical practice. Written primarily by physical therapists who are both researchers and clinicians, the six chapters in this volume range from comprehensive literature reviews to original research studies. The chapters highlight theoretical models, measurement tools, and interventions relevant to paediatric occupational therapy and physical therapy practice. The authors have done a remarkable job of integrating their research findings into a clinically relevant format, with each chapter presenting conclusions regarding implications for clinical practice. The volume is structured in such a way that even though the content is drawn from separate research papers, the reader can also see the bigger picture. Some of the chapters are quite lengthy, and this may initially dissuade some busy clinicians. However, the practical focus of the chapters makes the book quite reader friendly and relevant to clinicians. For example, one of the chapters on service delivery, which is more theoretical in nature, includes a clinical case study to illustrate its concepts. Offering this content in both book and journal format also makes the materials more accessible to clinicians. (The content may look familiar to some readers, as it was co-published simultaneously as volume 24, numbers 1 and 2, of the journal Physical and Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics in 2004.) Movement Sciences contains chapters pertaining to areas such as postural control, predictors of standing balance, reliability of a measurement of muscle extensibility, activity-based intervention, enhancing prehension skills, and understanding changes in mobility in children with CP over time. For this reason, the book may offer relevant information to clinicians in many different areas of paediatric therapy. Readers may choose to read the book from cover to cover, to read one chapter related to their current practice, or to make use of the clinical implications included at the end of each chapter to get a quick summary or review of the authors’ salient points. Movement Sciences: Transfer of Knowledge into Pediatric Therapy Practice contains information relevant to most paediatric therapists, and it is hoped that review of the contents will encourage clinicians to reflect on their current practice and promote discussion as to which assessment tools and intervention strategies should be integrated into clinical practice. This book will also provide clinicians with examples of how their practice can contribute to further research in paediatric therapy.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,467 | 0,375 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».