Anthropology and Ethnicity's Interplay among First Nations in Canada: The Case of Quebec
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract / Resume This article presents Quebec as a multicultural province which is ethnically polarized in such a way to affect the formation processes of Indigenous ethnology styles. The data presented here are of three kinds: political chronology, interethnic relations, and collective demands. It is our expectation to promote by this brief presentation Quebec's uniqueness as an ethnographic case study for the research of the development of styles of ethnology in national contexts. L'article presente le Quebec comme une province multiculturelle qui est polarisee sur le plan ethnique d'une maniere qui a des incidences sur les processus de formation de styles d'ethnologie autochtones. Les donnees presentees traitent de la chronologie politique, des relations interethniques et des exigences collectives. Le bref article vise a promouvoir le caractere unique du Quebec a titre d'etude de cas ethnographique de l'elaboration des styles d'ethnologie dans des contextes nationaux. Introduction The paper presented here was developed under the Research Project (CNPq/Department of Anthropology - UnB/Brazil) entitled: Comparative Ethnology: Brazil, Australia, and Canada with additional research projects among populations in Brazil. have been offering comparative insights regarding anthropological advocacy issues toward Indigenous or Aboriginal societies among national states facing major development projects. This research project (for which this is only a brief description) consists in a scientific investigation of official politics designed for Native, Aboriginal, or Indigenous populations situated under the wardship or tutelage of nation-states. Its main concern consists in the anthropological analyzes of the remaking of ethnic identities of social groups involved by these politics. In this sense, the main theoretical of this paper relates to the constitution of the public ethnicity of Fist Nations in Canada (Weaver, 1984) and its impact over the formation of styles of ethnology in this country. The attempt to understand how Native populations have been maintaining their ethnic identity and cultural diversity within national states such as Brazil and Canada has not been new. Nevertheless, the crosscultural approach between Brazilian and politics regarding its minorities has not been done as often as it could. For this reason the theoretical traditionally faced by Ethnology in Brazil are comparable to the theoretical faced by Ethnology in Canada (which implies a redefinition of both ethnological traditions in wider terms). The overall is to identify how different sectors of society and government define the Indian problem (Dych, 1996) in both national contexts. To put it in other words we might say that the main question is how Indigenous, Aboriginal, or Native claims are transformed into problems in order to be dealt with by public policies of the State or by advocacy projects created by anthropologists as consultants or by the Indians themselves. How does it happen and how has it been anthropologically thought in the context are the two major questions to be initially treated under this faculty research program. The comparative exercise between Brazil and Canada will contribute theoretically to a better understanding of how Ethnology as a scientific discipline has been applied to different national contexts towards its Native minorities. The four-week experience in Canada offered by the Faculty Research Program helped as an empirical starting point to notice emerging questions and redefine common to both nations and First Nations. This contributes specifically to current investigations held in Brazil by anthropologists interested in the impact of their works and researches over the lives of those they study. Canadian Studies are an important point of departure to new research questions, methodologies, and comparative investigations that has to critically elucidate ethnic, political, and ethnic aspects of both national states' official policies towards Indigenous, Aboriginal, or Native minorities. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».