MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1477193297

Thanks to our generous volunteers

2012· article· en· W1477193297 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lloyd Keddie

Notice bibliographique

RevuePubMed Central · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGovernment (linguistics)Agency (philosophy)Animal healthProfessional associationAnimal welfarePolitical scienceCompanion animalPublic relationsMedicineBusinessPublic administrationVeterinary medicineSociology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

While attending a provincial meeting recently, I was asked how the CVMA is involved at the national level on behalf of Canadian veterinarians. Perhaps the best way to illustrate the Association’s involvement would be to mention some of the organizations on which the CVMA has representation and to state the organizations’ mandates. The Canadian Animal Health Coalition serves the farmed-animal industry; the Aquatic Animal Health Consultative Committee is the primary industry-government interface for Aquatic Animal Health; the Canadian Coalition for Public Health in the 21st Century is a national network of not for profit organizations, professional associations, health charities, and academic researchers who share the common goal to improve and sustain the health of Canadians; the Canadian Council on Animal Care sets standards for animal use in science that apply across Canada; the CVMA/AVMA (American Veterinary Medical Association) Council on Education accredits DVM programs; the National Companion Animal Coalition promotes socially responsible pet ownership and enhances the health and well-being of companion animals; and the National Farm Animal Care Council promotes responsible farm animal care. The CVMA also has representation on several Veterinary Drug Directorate (VDD) Advisory Committees including ones on Minor Uses/Minor Species and Canadian Animal Health Products. The CVMA Council has regular meetings with the VDD, the Canadian Animal Health Institute, the Canadian Food Inspection Agency, and other national organizations. While this list is far from complete, it provides some insight into the CVMA involvement at this level. Since April 15 to 21 is National Volunteer Week in Canada, it is an appropriate time to acknowledge the over 450 volunteers who donate their time and talents to the CVMA and to let them know how much their efforts are appreciated. The following is a sample of how some of these volunteers are involved in the CVMA on behalf of all veterinarians: 14 council members (comprised of 1 representative from each of the provinces, a representative from the SCVMA and 2 college representatives) attend a minimum of 3 in-house meetings a year. Executive members attend at least 3 additional meetings. The CVMA Council is mandated to establish the general policies and overall priorities of the Association while the CVMA Executive is mandated to oversee the management of the Association. Presently, the CVMA has 12 committees and advisory boards. Members of the various committees have an in-house meeting at least once a year. They include the following: The National Examining Board (8 members) administers the National Examining Board Exams (Basic and Clinical Sciences Exam [BCSE], North American Veterinary Licensing Examination [NAVLE] the Clinical Proficiency Exam [CPE]) and participates in the accreditation of veterinary colleges. The Editorial Committee (6 members) oversees the operation of The Canadian Veterinary Journal and the Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research. The Animal Welfare Committee (6 members and 5 ex officio members) promotes animal welfare to industry and the public. It develops scientific-based animal welfare position statements. The National Issues Committee (4 members) identifies national issues pertinent to CVMA members, develops position statements, and monitors federal government activities. The Business Management Committee (6 members) analyzes the business and economic environment, assists veterinarians in the management of their business, and promotes a healthy lifestyle. The Animal Health Technology/Veterinary Technician Accreditation Program Committee (3 CVMA members and 3 animal health technicians [AHTs]) promotes standards of education and training for AHTs and recommends accreditation levels for AHT programs. The Professional Development Committee (3 members) addresses all continuing education for the CVMA including the program for the CVMA annual convention. The Insurance and Investment Program Committee (historically 1 person) is responsible for providing members with pertinent and competitive insurance. The Students of the CVMA (SCVMA) is comprised of 5 members, one from each veterinary college in Canada. The SCVMA enables the exchange of information between the colleges and with the CVMA on issues concerning students. The SCVMA president is a member of the CVMA Council. There are 3 CVMA Advisory Groups: The Student Liaison Group (5 members comprised of one faculty member from each of the 5 colleges) enhances the link between student veterinarians and the CVMA. The Environmental Advisory Group (3 members) advises the CVMA on environmental issues affecting the profession. The Communication Advisory Group (4 members) advises the CVMA on internal and external communication initiatives. To all of these and those not mentioned, thank you on behalf of all Canadian veterinarians. This is my last article before the CVMA Convention that will be held July 11–14 in beautiful Montreal, Quebec. I ask you to please check out the fantastic scientific and social programs, and I look forward to seeing you there.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,079
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,404

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,039
Tête enseignante GPT0,229
Écart entre enseignants0,191 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePubMed CentralMême sujetAnimal Disease Management and EpidemiologyTravaux en français237 207