MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1480712478

Computational studies of reactions involving 1st, 2nd, and 3rd row elements and the performance of theory

2007· dissertation· en· W1480712478 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Mohammad Shahidul Islam

Notice bibliographique

RevueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2007
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomainePhysics and Astronomy
ThématiqueAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Mots-clésBromineChemistryHalogenationDissociation (chemistry)Computational chemistryMoleculeReaction mechanismMechanism (biology)Physical chemistryOrganic chemistryCatalysisPhysics
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This thesis has involved detailed computational studies of the mechanisms of several chemical reactions involving first, second and third row elements. Geometries of the relevant molecules were optimized at the HF, MP2 and B3LYP levels using the 6-31G(d), 6-31+G(d), 6-31G(d,p) and aug-cc-pVDZ basis sets. Gaussian-n theories such as G3MP2, G3MP2B3 and G3B3 were also used, as they are expected to adequately reproduce experimental data. The complete reaction pathways for all the mechanisms have been verified using intrinsic reaction coordinate (IRC) analysis. -- The reactions of SiH₃ X (X = H, Cl, Br, I) with HCN were investigated and three different mechanisms were obtained. One of the mechanisms involves HX elimination by a one-step pathway producing SiH₃ CN. The second mechanism consists of H₂ elimination, producing SiH₂ XCN via a one-step pathway or three multiple-step pathways. The third mechanism involves dissociation of SiH₃ X to various products, which can then react with HCN. -- We have found for the first time that the mechanism of the addition of bromine to alkenes involves reaction with two bromine molecules in non-polar aprotic solvents, while in polar protic solvents the mechanism involves reaction with a single bromine molecule mediated by a solvent molecule. For both cases, the calculated activation energies were found to be in excellent agreement with experiment. We proposed a kinetic expression that accounts for the difference between bromination of alkenes in protic and aprotic solvents. We also found that bromination of adamantylideneadamantane should occur spontaneously in the gas phase as well as in some solvents with no reaction barrier. -- We have found that for third row elements the BC6-31G basis set which is widely used as a 6-31G basis set in most of the commercial quantum chemistry packages does not meet the definition of the standard 6-31G basis set. A comparative study of the performance of the standard 6-31G and Binning-Curtiss (BC6-31G) basis sets for third row elements, Ga, Ge, As, Se, and Br, was carried out. Frequencies and thermodynamic values obtained by using the standard 6-31G basis set are better than those obtained using the BC6-31G basis set when compared to experiment and G3MF2. We recommend that the standard 6-31G basis set be used for calculations involving 3rd row elements. -- The kinetic isotope effects (KIEs), a major experimental tool to determine the transition state (TS) structure, have been used to characterize the transition state structure of SN2 reactions. Chlorine leaving group k³⁵/k³⁷ , nucleophile carbon k¹¹/k¹⁴ and secondary α-deuterium [(kH/kD)α] kinetic isotope effects (KIEs) have been calculated for the SN2 reactions between para-substituted benzyl chlorides and cyanide ion and compared to the experimental results to determine whether these isotope effects can be used to determine the substituent effect on the structure of the transition state. It was found that both leaving group and nucleophile KIE vary with the TS structure. However, a correct and measurable substituent effect on leaving group KIEs will only be found for a very reactant-like or for a very product-like TS. The substituent effect on nucleophile KIEs will only be found when the Nu-Cα bond formation in the TS is well advanced i.e., in a product-like SN2 TS. -- Nucleophile carbon k¹¹/k¹⁴ and secondary a-deuterium [(kH/kD)α] kinetic isotope effects (KIEs) were also calculated for the SN2 reactions between tetrabutylammonium cyanide and ethyl iodide, bromide, chloride and tosylate and compared to the experimental results to determine whether these isotope effects can be used to determine the structure of the SN2 transition states. The results showed that the nucleophile carbon k¹¹/k¹⁴ KIEs can be used to determine the transition state structure in different reactions and the results suggest that changing to a poorer leaving group leads to a tighter transition state. The magnitude of the experimental secondary α-deuterium KIE is related to the nucleophile - leaving group distance in the SN2 transition state (RTS ) for reactions with a halogen leaving group. However, the calculated and experimental α-deuterium KIEs show opposite trends with leaving group ability. -- In conclusion, the results of my doctoral research have greatly increased our knowledge of the mechanisms, transition state structures and the thermodynamic properties of reactions involving 1st, 2nd and 3rd row elements.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,298
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)→Même sujetAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies→Travaux en français237 207→