The implementation of new health protection scheme in Hong Kong in relationship to expensive chemotherapy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: As in the rest of the world, cancer has been a leading killer in Hong Kong. Though technology has been growing rapidly, expensive cancer treatments have continuously been problematic to patients and their families. There are some known risk factors that make some people have a higher risk for cancer than others, but the reason why some develop cancer and some do not is mostly still unknown. In addition, the expensive cancer treatments can distress patients and their families psychologically during the painful and long chemotherapy process which is a common cancer treatment. While it is important for experts to research on effective cancer treatment, it is also important for the government and health care experts to solve associated financial problems. In response to help patients to ease their financial burden of expensive medical treatment, the Hong Kong government has proposed a new health protection scheme (HPS), “My Health, My Choice.” \n \nObjective: In this paper, a systematic review on different published literatures is conducted to analyze the prospective outcome of HPS and if it can help patients to ease their financial burden. \n \nResults and Discussion: The Health scheme provides a financial aid option for patients who suffer from chemotherapy through monthly premium. However, the implementation of this HPS seems to be difficult both on the patients’ and the providers’ sides. Case study of health care systems in US and Canada is included in this paper to find out what Hong Kong can learn from other countries with completely different payment systems would manage to deal with this problem. Australia which with a universal coverage health care system has also proposed a similar HPS plan aiming to help lower health care cost by increasing individual responsibility on medical expenses. However, it failed by lack of support from the general public. The Australian example would be used to criticize some essential elements that would contribute to the failure of the HPS, and how Hong Kong would use this example \nto yield a better proposal. \n \nConclusion: As HPS might not be able to ease the burden on cancer patients in Hong Kong, it is suggested for government to allocate more effective and direct resources on helping cancer patients, especially those who are receiving chemotherapy or improve services through better primary care. However, the final outcome remains unknown, and the final option still depends on the ultimate need from the general public.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,024 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».