The way we look: exploring visual methodologies in occupational science
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Visual methodologies and methods encompass the use of various types of visual materials in systematic ways to understand, explain, and/or express a phenomenon. Visual methods can add to the study of occupation in numerous ways; for example, to access tacit and taken-for-granted aspects of occupation and to enhance awareness of cultural elements of occupation. In particular, visual methodologies and methods provide a key means to enact occupational science in critically informed ways, as they can be employed to work with collectives experiencing occupational marginalization to raise awareness of injustices and engage in praxis (Asaba et al., in press; Gastaldo, Carrasco & Magalhaes 2012; Hartman et al., 2011; Park, 2012).\nThe key objectives of this institute include: a) engage in a collective dialogue to identify epistemological, ethical, and practical considerations for research that employs visual methodologies and methods; b) provoke reflexivity regarding how the ‘visual’ is understood, constructed and interpreted; c) provide hands-on experience engaging with visual materials, and working through connecting a research purpose with visual methodologies and methods; d) collectively identify future possibilities for the use of visual methodologies and methods and e) provide opportunities to network amongst scholars with interests in visual methodologies and methods.\nPart 1 of the institute will focus on epistemological, practical and ethical considerations. In order to facilitate critical reflection regarding how the ‘visual’ is understood and its potential to add to the study of occupation, 3, fifteen minute presentations will be used to illustrate epistemological, practical and ethical considerations in designing, carrying out, interpreting and disseminating such research. More specifically, examples will draw upon studies that have used body mapping to explore the impact of undocumentedness among migrant workers residing in the Great Toronto Area; Photovoice to identify and explore what supports and hinders aging processes among elder migrants in Sweden and Japan; and video and photography in ethnography for microanalysis of transformative processes that emerge in the interactions between persons and symbolic representation of embodied experiences. Following the presentations, participants will be divided into 3 small facilitated groups, with each group focused on one type of consideration (i.e., epistemological, practical, ethical). These small groups will share their lists of key considerations, and lists will be circulated to all participants who provide email contact information.\nThe second part will provide opportunities for hands-on engagement, in 1 of 3 groups. In one group, working with participants’ research ideas, facilitators will guide participants through the process of developing a rationale for using visual methods, reflecting on their epistemological perspective, and attempting to fit their research purpose and epistemological position with a methodology. In the second group, facilitators will expose participants to various ways photos can be drawn upon in research, and explore possibilities for analyses and interpretation of photographs. In the third group, participants will be lead through an approach to analysis of video and photographic material from narrative-phenomenological perspectives. The workshop will end with a discussion focused on identifying future possibilities for the use of visual methodologies and methods in occupational science.\nKey words: epistemology, ethics, reflexivity
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,047 | 0,038 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,007 | 0,006 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,061 |
| Communication savante | 0,034 | 0,022 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,020 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».