MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1482289464 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v53i4.745

Pharmacist Shortage: a Wake-Up Call for the Profession

2000· article· en· W1482289464 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Linda MacKeigan

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEconomic shortagePharmacyPharmacistCommissionBusinessMedicinePublic relationsFamily medicinePolitical scienceFinanceGovernment (linguistics)

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

As many pharmacy directors know, it has become very difficult to fill pharmacist positions. In some hospitals, 25% of positions are vacant, and some Ontario hospitals are offering signing bonuses to new pharmacists. However, the shortage is not confined to hospitals. In March of this year, the Canadian Association of Chain Drug Stores (CACDS) issued a press release drawing attention to an acute shortage of pharmacists, estimated at 1000 for its member chains. The CACDS called for an immediate increase in enrollment in pharmacy schools and fast-tracking of the licensing of foreign-trained pharmacists. The shortage is worldwide. In Canada the total shortage is currently estimated at 1500, and in the United States it was estimated at 3500 in 1999. The US Congress has commissioned a study of the problem, with the final report to be submitted in early December 2000. The American situation may be exacerbating the shortage in Canada. US chains are running strong recruiting campaigns for Canadian pharmacy graduates, offering very attractive salaries and signing bonuses. Several questions arise. First, what is the extent of the shortage — which regions in Canada and what type of positions are most affected? Second, why was the profession caught unawares? Just 5 years ago the Pew Health Profession Commission warned American educators of an impending oversupply of pharmacists because of the extent to which advances in information, communication, and dispensing technologies would increase pharmacy efficiency. It recommended that 20% to 25% of pharmacy schools in the United States close. Fortunately, none did. Indeed, several new private schools have opened since. Third, what is driving the shortage? Is it an issue of growing demand or reduced supply? The CACDS cited demand-side factors such as expansion in the role of the pharmacist, continued increase in prescription volume fuelled by the aging of the population, increased numbers of chain pharmacies, and increased operating hours. Equally plausible supplyside factors include feminization of the profession, which may be contributing to more pharmacists working on a part-time basis or taking temporary leave from the workforce, and migration of pharmacists to the United States or into pharmaceutical companies or managed care organizations, where salaries and working conditions may be better. Hospital pharmacy has its own set of issues: noncompetitive salaries (remember the threatened walkout in Quebec last summer and the walkout at the Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre a few months ago), a limited career ladder, lengthy maternity leaves, and early retirements, to name a few. The situation may be particularly acute in teaching hospitals in urban centres, where the stresses of juggling clinical teaching, service responsibilities, and urban living induce pharmacists to seek other living and working environments. What’s being done to respond to the shortage? Some faculties of pharmacy are increasing their enrollment. In 1999, the University of Toronto (U of T) increased its first-year enrollment from 120 to 140 students to begin to rectify a longstanding situation in which U of T graduates have constituted only one-third of the pharmacists licensed each year in Ontario (at present, Ontario pharmacies must recruit pharmacists from other provinces and other countries). The overall plan is to double enrollment (to 240) by 2003. The Universite de Montreal will increase its enrollment from 145 to 165 in the fall of 2000. Other schools are also considering increases. However, increases in enrollment lead to the need for additional instructional resources and funding from the province and thus take time to be approved and implemented. Moreover, it takes 4 years for an

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,009
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,016
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,992
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,138

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0090,016
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0110,008
Communication savante0,0110,014
Science ouverte0,0040,008
Intégrité de la recherche0,0520,032
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0410,015

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,125
Tête enseignante GPT0,422
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2000
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Même sujetPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes→Travaux en français237 207→