MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1486921040

The Determination of Sea Tourism Season According to the Climatical Conditions in Marmaris-Alanya Coastal Belt (SW of Turkey)

2008· article· en· W1486921040 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yüksel Güçlü

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of tourism · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCruise Tourism Development and Management
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésTourismGeographyDestinationsClimate changeRecreationTemperate climateSeasonalityEcology
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Introduction Weather and climate, together with some other natural resources, such as geographical location, orography and landscape, play important roles for and recreation (de Freitas, 2003). elements, having the greatest influence on tourism, are temperature, sunshine radiation, precipitation, wind, humidity and fog (from Stern et al. 2000; Hamilton and Lau, 2004; Gomez Martin, 2005; Matzarakis, 2001, Cengiz et al, 2008) Tourism is one of the world's largest, fastest growing and most climate-dependent economic sectors (Wall, 2007). is influential for international tourism, which being situation-specific is responsive to its variability and change. One of the major attributes of the most tourist destinations is seasonality. Not only is there a regular round of activities associated with the seasons, there is also variation in activity in areas lacking a marked seasonal climate. This is because seasonal variations in visitation to areas of supply. Thus, for example, the desire for many Canadians to escape the Canadian winter to warmer climates creates a seasonal demand in temperate and tropical areas which do not have the same degree of annual variation in temperature (Wall, 2007). Maddison (2001) investigated the importance of climate as a determinant of the destination choice made by British tourists (Corobov, 2007). Various places in the world have a and weather and climate set limits. For example, administrators do not promote places with a little potential or appeal, as this would not be profitable. On the other hand, the tourist who chooses to visit such places would suffer inconvenience discomfort. Rainy summers or less snowy winters can have significant impacts on tourism (de Freitas, 2001). Climatic information can be useful in decision-making if presented in an appropriate form. Therefore it is important to identify which climate-related criteria people use to make their decisions about holiday destinations, taking into account that the human response to climate depends on individual perception and sensitivity (de Freitas, 2001). Favourable climate and weather conditions are essential advantages for recreational and activity. However, in temperate climatic belt they are characterised by seasonality. Tourism is highly dependent on climate. Climate factors, such as temperature, wind and sunshine, account for a large share of the succes of major regions, such as the Mediterranean (Amelung and Viner, 2007). The research dealing with climate relationships should consider three categories of information (de Freitas, 2003). These are aesthetic factors (cloudness, visibility, sunshine duration, day length), physical state of the atmosphere (precipitation, snow cower, wind, solar radiation, UV radiation, air pollution) and bio-thermal conditions (human heat balance considerations). to this concept, the actual weather is one of the basic demand indicators of recreational and potentials of any time, season and/or region (Blazejczyk, 2007). According to de (2001), there are two further aspects of climate that are relevant to tourism: first, there is the physical aspect. Here, the climate facilitates or hinders certain tourist activities whether through rain, wind or snow. For example, wind and rain will make a day of sunbathing at the beach impossible. Second, there is the aesthetic aspect of climate. This may be through the quality of light that affects the appearance of the tourists' surroundings or it may come from the appearance of the sky and of the sea and other water bodies. In the long run, climate has an effect on the other elements that fall under the aesthetic category of de Freitas (Hamilton, 2007). data must be presented in a form that relates to the individual's response to the weather or climate conditions. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,546
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,362

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,023
Tête enseignante GPT0,310
Écart entre enseignants0,288 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2008
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of tourismMême sujetCruise Tourism Development and ManagementTravaux en français237 207