MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1487329980

Bread and Roses (a)cross the Pacific

2000· article· en· W1487329980 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueHecate · 2000
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBeautyBattleWhite (mutation)SingingHistoryArtSociologyAestheticsAncient history
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

and Roses (a)cross the Pacific and Roses As we go marching, marching, in the beauty of the day, A million darkened kitchens, a thousand mill lofts grey Are touched with all the radiance that a sudden sun discloses, For the people hear us singing: Bread and and Roses! As we go marching, marching, we battle too for men, For they are women's children and we mother them again. Our lives shall not be sweated from birth until life closes. Hearts starve as well as bodies; Give us bread but give us roses. As we go marching, marching, unnumbered women dead Go crying through our singing their ancient call for bread. Small art and love and beauty their drudging spirits knew, Yes, it is bread we fight for, But we fight for roses too! As we go marching, marching, we bring the greater days. The rising of the women means the rising of the race, No more the drudge and idler, ten that toil where one reposes, But a sharing of life's glories: and roses! and roses! Introduction During the 1980s, whilst working on cultural projects with South Australian unions, I first became aware of the use of and Roses iconography to signify the struggle for justice and quality of life and the struggle for equality of women and immigrant workers. The James Oppenheim(1) song `Bread and Roses' was familiar to me, but I first encountered the imagery through the and Roses Cultural Project and Gallery of District 1199 of the Health Employees Union in New York. During 1989 I visited the project and met its inspiring director Moe Foner. On that trip I also visited Canada and met Carole Conde and Karl Beveridge, two Toronto based Canadian artists with a long history of working with unions. In their house was a beautiful and Roses rug made by Carole, and it is an image often used in their work. There have been many subsequent exchange visits between Canadian and Australian activists leading to comparisons of the respective states of women's representation and of cultural work in both countries. These visits gave rise to discussions in Adelaide about how we attempt to signify women's struggles for equality and justice within the labour movement, given that its history is so strongly masculine. The richness and resonance of the and Roses symbol has impressed several of us, and yet can such a symbol be transplanted (or appropriated) in Australia when few people here are aware of the historical events it symbolises and that it is not part of `our' industrial history anyway? The conversations below have grown out of these discussions, across the Pacific, and are part of on-going projects to interrogate and rejuvenate the signification and representation of women in the labour movement. The first conversation occurred in Toronto in 1999. Carole Conde is a Toronto based artist, feminist and labour activist; Maureen Hynes is coordinator of the School of Labour at George Brown College, and also a feminist, unionist and poet, and Catherine McLeod is the former director of communications for the Canadian Autoworkers Union and also a feminist, cultural policy activist and author. They gathered over a couple of glasses of wine and responded to some questions we had suggested. Maureen Hynes edited the transcript. The second conversation occurred in Adelaide in February 2000. Having read the transcript of their Canadian sisters' conversation, Michelle Hogan and Jude Elton then talked over the same terrain with Kathie Muir, who edited the Australian transcript. Other Australians consulted included visual and labour arts historian Sandy Kirby, artist Megan Evans and artist and unionist Anne Learmonth. We all enjoyed the experience of having parallel conversations with our sisters on opposite sides of the Pacific Ocean. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,818
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,011
Tête enseignante GPT0,250
Écart entre enseignants0,238 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle