"To Acquire What Knologe You Can": Thomas Jefferson as Exploration Patron and Planner
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
PERHAPS no American president wrote more letters to more correspondents about a wider range of subjects than Thomas Jefferson. It was as if he composed his life and world with pen and paper. Of all those letters, one stands out as central document for American exploration of West. Dated in Washington 20 June 1803 but undoubtedly drafted earlier, Jefferson's letter of exploration instructions for Meriwether Lewis became defining document, fundamental charter for government exploration beyond wide Missouri. Our friend and colleague Ted Carter knew that letter well because, as I will explain in a moment, an earlier version of it is here at American Philosophical Society. In one letter Jefferson defined nature and methodology of scientific exploration, made it a national priority, and then handed that mission to United States Army. No single piece of writing had greater influence on day-to-day business of exploration for rest of nineteenth century-and perhaps even into our own time-than president's letter to Lewis. Some sixteen years after Jefferson wrote to Lewis, secretary of War John C. Calhoun busied himself preparing directions for first government reconnaissance of central Great Plains. At end of those detailed guidelines, secretary simply told Major Stephen H. Long to consult what Jefferson had written for Lewis. In not much more than a decade and a half, Jefferson's letter had become acknowledged master plan for exploring West. We think of exploration as a journey through a physical landscape, a journey that has a beginning at some particular place along route. But most important beginnings are ones made before leaving home. They are explorations into country of mind. Exploration beginnings are most often found in questions because at heart exploration is about inquiry. Lewis and Clark-and all those who followed after them-questioned their way West. For most explorers in Euro-American tradition those questions came as formal, written instructions. Think of those instruction documents as program: exploration software to run expedition hardware. Such written instructions were nothing new for Jefferson and his contemporaries. England's Royal Society had been giving travelers and merchants lists of questions for nearly fifty years. But by middle of eighteenth century-thanks in large part to Enlightenment's passion for orderly, rational inquiryexploration instructions took on a new shape and substance. Those instructions shifted attention from exotic to useful, from personal adventure to cooperative enterprise and careful observation, from individual glory to national power and imperial expansion. That redefinition of exploration instructions was largely work of Sir Joseph Banks and an intellectual-imperial circle that involved mariners, scholars, and bureaucrats in Royal Society and Admiralty. More than any other single figure, Banks embodied and defined Enlightenment exploration and its global reach. Patron, planner, and sometime participant in Cook and Vancouver enterprises, Banks was what one contemporary called the common Center of we Discoverers. For voyage after voyage, Banks wrote instructions; others did sailing. Banks and Jefferson neither met nor corresponded but they had remarkably parallel lives and careers. Both were presidents of their nations' most distinguished scholarly societies-Banks at Royal Society, and Jefferson at this venerable institution. Both were avid botanists, placing great emphasis on discovery of new plants for foodstuffs and medicines. Both cultivated large and far-flung circles of correspondents. Both placed useful knowledge at center of scientific pursuit. Both insisted that such knowledge was always to be in service of imperial expansion. Both were patrons of art and science of exploration. And both knew that exploration was a complex business demanding many minds and many hands. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,025 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,013 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,009 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,010 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,032 | 0,010 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».