Survey on the Assessment of the Current Actual Expenses Incurred by Students on the Meals and Accommodation within and around the Campuses: The Case of Tanzania Higher Education Students’ Loans Beneficiaries
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This Survey analyses the current actual expenses incurred by students on the meals and accommodation within and around the campuses. The study was geared towards achieving the following objectives: (i) to examine the current cost incurred by a students for meals In Campus, (ii) to examine the current cost incurred by a students for accommodation In Campus, (iii) to examine the current cost incurred by a students for meals Off Campus, (iv) to examine the current cost incurred by a students for accommodation Off Campus, (v) to identify the Institutional indicated Prices for both Meals and Accommodations There have been many complaints from various stakeholders concerning the current meals and accommodation allowance given, which was last revised in year 2010/2011. The allowances given was claimed to be low compared to the real cost of living which is very much affected by inflation. The fact was also supported by the Parliament during 2014/2015 budget session. Based on these complains, and the real market situation it becomes necessary for Higher Education Students’ Loans Board (HESLB) to conduct this survey. The survey was conducted in 13 regions in Tanzania, Dar es salaam, Arusha, Kilimanjaro, Tanga, Mtwara, Morogoro, Iringa, Mbeya, Dodoma, Tabora, Mwanza, Kagera, and Unguja, in which 70 universities and 105 cafeteria were visited. Data were collected from 1120 students’ respondents and 105 managers/owners of the cafeterias/hotels/kiosks. Data were analysed using SPSS computer software. The study concluded that students are willing to pay Tanzanian Shillings (Tshs.) 5,000 at minimum for breakfast, lunch and dinner and also a maximum of Tshs. 7,500. It was further shown that students prefer paying accommodation for both In Campus and Off Campus at the rate between Tshs. 300 and Tshs. 700 even though they actually pay between Tshs. 1,000 and Tshs. 1,700 Off Campus and between Tshs. 300 and Tshs. 1,000 for accommodation In Campus. Also 90% of students’ respondents revealed that Tshs. 7,500 given now as meals and accommodation allowance is not sufficient. It was also concluded that the institutional set prices for meals and accommodation have no any effect on the real price prevailing. Based on the results of the analysis the study recommended that HESLB should advise the Government to consider revising the allowances for meals (breakfast, lunch and dinner) at the students maximum preference which is Tshs. 7,500 plus accommodation cost which should be at Tshs. 2,500 (a maximum amount paid for accommodation Off Campus + associated costs such as water bills, electricity bills and security bills) the sum should be equal to Tshs. 10,000 which was the maximum amount preferred by more than 50% of the students’ respondents, that is Tshs. (7,500 + 1,700 + 800 = 10,000). Universities should administer and manage the cafeterias within the university so that they can control prices, quality as well as taste and preference of the students because these cafeterias can save a lot of students as they spend most of their time In Campus.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle