Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
fundUn bailleur canadien est enregistré sur le travail.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.
Revuenon disponible
Typedissertation
Languept
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducation and Public Policy
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesU.S. Air Force AcademyHEC MontréalUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroUniversity of Colorado DenverCalifornia State University, BakersfieldCalifornia State University, NorthridgeBinghamton UniversityCalifornia State University, FullertonUniversity at BuffaloUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel HillUniversity of North Carolina WilmingtonCollege of Engineering, Michigan State UniversityUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignFu Jen Catholic UniversityPontificia Universidad Católica de ChileBilkent ÜniversitesiHong Kong University of Science and TechnologyUniversity of Michigan-DearbornBrock UniversityChinese University of Hong KongSonoma State UniversityKing Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsPittsburg State UniversityQueen's UniversityDalhousie UniversityConcordia UniversityCalifornia State University, SacramentoKorea UniversitySeoul National UniversitySejong UniversitySun Yat-sen UniversityCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorUniversiteit MaastrichtCalifornia State University, ChicoErasmus Universiteit RotterdamUniversity of QueenslandUniversity College DublinNanyang Technological UniversityNational University of SingaporeCranfield UniversityUniversity of GlasgowKing's College LondonU.S. Air ForceWest Chester UniversityLoyola Marymount UniversityUniversity of California, IrvineEastern Michigan UniversityUniversity of California, DavisUniversidad del AtlánticoNational Chengchi UniversityFayetteville State UniversityFairfield UniversityMemorial University of NewfoundlandUniversity of MemphisSalisbury UniversityUniversity of South DakotaUniversity of South AlabamaSouthern Methodist UniversityUniversity of OregonRadford UniversityNiagara UniversityNorthern Michigan UniversityIndiana University SoutheastMontclair State UniversityLouisiana Tech UniversityEmporia State UniversityValdosta State UniversityWilliam Paterson University of New JerseyEastern Illinois UniversityKeio UniversityUniversity of Louisiana MonroeUniversity of Southern MaineNorth Carolina Central UniversityMorgan State UniversityBowling Green State UniversityOld Dominion UniversityUniversity of Central MissouriUniversity of California, Los AngelesDePaul UniversityUniversity of DenverKuwait UniversityUniversity of WaikatoFlorida Gulf Coast UniversityYoungstown State UniversityNew Mexico State UniversityDuquesne UniversityFordham UniversitySouthern Arkansas UniversityUniversity of West FloridaIdaho State UniversityJackson State UniversityChapman UniversityKennesaw State UniversityEastern Washington UniversityWestern Washington UniversityPepperdine UniversityWeber State UniversityMontana State UniversityUniversity of LouisvilleSanta Clara UniversitySan José State UniversityWest Virginia UniversityUniversity of Massachusetts BostonUniversity of South CarolinaUniversity of Minnesota DuluthUniversity of OttawaUniversity of MontevalloUniversity of Southern MississippiUniversity of MontanaBrigham Young UniversityGeorgia Southern UniversityCoastal Carolina UniversityBall State UniversityDartmouth CollegeLouisiana State UniversityFlorida Atlantic UniversityColumbus State UniversityJames Madison UniversityUniversity of Notre DameCarnegie Mellon UniversityFort Lewis CollegePennsylvania State UniversityEastern Kentucky UniversityTulane UniversityUniversity of AucklandOregon State UniversityUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnWorcester Polytechnic InstituteVanderbilt UniversityUniversity of CincinnatiUniversité LavalKorea Advanced Institute of Science and TechnologyElon UniversityWashington State UniversityUniversity of MiamiGeorgetown UniversityUniversity of OklahomaBrandeis UniversityMichigan State UniversityUniversity of WashingtonNorth Carolina State UniversityUniversity of Northern ColoradoVirginia Commonwealth UniversityDrexel UniversityUnited Arab Emirates UniversityUniversity of the PacificBradley UniversityCase Western Reserve UniversityCity University of Hong KongIowa State UniversityUniversity of PittsburghWashington University in St. LouisJohn Carroll UniversityWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of Central FloridaCalifornia State University, East BayAuburn UniversityMississippi State UniversityNorthern Arizona UniversityUniversity of ChicagoWashington and Lee UniversityUniversity of Northern IowaVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityMiddle Tennessee State UniversityVillanova UniversityValparaiso UniversityFlorida State UniversityColorado State UniversityUniversity of Wisconsin-Eau ClaireCalifornia Polytechnic State University, San Luis ObispoNorthern Kentucky UniversityUtah State UniversityWestern Carolina UniversityCity University of New YorkMarquette UniversityUniversity of MissouriClaremont Graduate UniversityNorthern Illinois UniversityWichita State UniversityEmory UniversityUniversity of Nebraska KearneyWestern Michigan UniversityCalifornia State University, StanislausKent State UniversityUniversity of OtagoUniversity of RochesterNorth Dakota State UniversityCleveland State UniversityLamar UniversityButler UniversityUniversity of West GeorgiaYale UniversityCalifornia State Polytechnic University, PomonaUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonUniversity of WarwickOhio State UniversityPortland State UniversityMcMaster UniversityLehigh UniversityUniversity of Missouri-Kansas CityEast Carolina UniversityNorthwestern UniversitySimon Fraser UniversityRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteWake Forest UniversityUniversity of North FloridaRice UniversityUniversity of South FloridaGeorge Washington UniversityBerry CollegeCollege of CharlestonWestern Kentucky UniversityGeorgia Institute of TechnologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaFlorida International UniversityUniversity of MinnesotaOklahoma State UniversityBoston CollegeUniversity of Nevada, RenoMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeSan Diego State UniversityLong Island UniversityClemson UniversityIndiana State UniversityQueensland University of TechnologyUniversity of MichiganCreighton UniversityUniversity of HartfordUniversity of North Carolina at CharlotteCalifornia State University, FresnoCentral Michigan UniversityEast Tennessee State UniversityUniversity of WyomingGrand Valley State UniversityNational Sun Yat-sen UniversityUniversity of Southern CaliforniaPurdue UniversityLoyola University ChicagoUniversity of Louisiana at LafayetteWashburn UniversityBoise State UniversityGeorgia State UniversityHarvard UniversityWayne State UniversityIllinois State UniversityUniversity of Central ArkansasUniversity of ManchesterFairleigh Dickinson UniversityUniversity of DaytonGeorge Mason UniversityUniversity of ConnecticutBaylor UniversityMichigan Technological UniversityUniversity of North TexasSan Francisco State UniversityYork University
Mots-clésHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical sciencePhysics
Résumé
récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex\n O sistema brasileiro de avaliação de programas de pós-graduação vem evoluindo desde 1976, sendo considerado como um dos mais eficientes do mundo. Este sistema tem se mostrado essencial para a formação de recursos humanos de alto nível e para o desenvolvimento efetivo da ciência e tecnologia no País, pois, por meio de seus critérios e indicadores, ele permite avaliar a qualidade dos programas e apontar as áreas que o Estado deseja desenvolver. Este trabalho tem por objetivo propor contribuições à gestão dos programas de pós-graduação stricto sensu em Administração do Brasil, com base nos sistemas de avaliação de pós-graduação norte-americano e brasileiro. Para tanto, procedeu-se uma pesquisa em oito programas: quatro nos Estados Unidos, credenciados pela Association to Advance Collegiate School of Business (AACSB), e quatro no Brasil, reconhecidos e recomendados pela Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). O método de pesquisa foi o estudo de casos múltiplos, baseado nos trabalhos de Eisenhardt (1989) e Yin (2003). A análise de dados seguiu as técnicas de agrupamento e de cluster sugeridas por Miles e Huberman (1994). Os principais resultados indicam diferenças na concepção e no uso dos sistemas pelos programas brasileiros e americanos. Por exemplo, nos Estados Unidos, os programas utilizam o sistema para assegurar o cumprimento da própria missão e atender a um padrão mínimo de qualidade. No Brasil, entretanto, os programas investem no aprimoramento da produção intelectual (qualidade e quantidade), na formação de alunos e na inserção social para cumprir com as exigências do sistema e obter maior nota. Contudo, propõe-se um o modelo de gestão que - além de atender aos requisitos do sistema de avaliação da CAPES - leve em consideração a realidade do programa e demais elementos importantes para seu contínuo aprimoramento, dentre eles, o plano estratégico, que abrange a missão e a visão; o egresso e as estratégias de acesso a recursos para melhor atender a seus stakeholders.\n
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Études des sciences et des technologies, Communication savante, Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,134
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
Tête enseignante Opus0,055
Tête enseignante GPT0,369
Écart entre enseignants0,314 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle
