MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1492849196 · doi:10.1177/1077699014531199

Book Review: <i>The Political Web: Media, Participation and Alternative Democracy</i> , by Peter Dahlgren

2014· article· en· W1492849196 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Oscar H. Gandy

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournalism & Mass Communication Quarterly · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSocial Media and Politics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPoliticsDemocracyMedia studiesPolitical scienceSocial mediaAdvertisingSociologyLawBusiness

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Political Web: Media, Participation and Alternative Democracy. Peter Dahlgren. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. 195 pp. $90 hbk. $28 pbk.Understandably, Peter Dahlgren, an emeritus professor of communication and media at Lund University in Sweden, writes primarily about European media and politics. Indeed, in his introductory chapter to The Political Web he uses political transformations tak- ing place in Modern, post-communist Slovenia as an example of kinds of moves that are being made toward development of paths to democracy. However, although his institutional references to governmental bodies tend to focus on parliamentary systems, he devotes an entire chapter to role of alternative and main- stream media strategies used by Occupy Wall Street (OWS) movement during its early development in United States. And while contributions of European schol- ars are featured most prominently in his systematic assessments of theoretical frame- works and perspectives that help to make sense of changes taking place around globe, scholars from Canada and United States are well represented.Dahlgren's book is focused on variety of paths being taken by different kinds of individuals in search of alternatives to traditional, arguably limited strategies for bringing about social change by democratic means. What these different paths have in common is their reliance on an array of networked digital communications resources that Dahlgren refers to quite simply as the web. The book is organized into three sections. The two chapters in first section are used to set stage with an overall assessment of current state of democracy, public participation, and attributes of web that establish its centrality in current period of transition. Three chapters in second section provide something akin to case studies through their exploration of discursive strategies pursued during first six weeks of OWS, and an assess- ment of characteristics and influence of online public intellectuals. The third chapter in this section uses an assessment of web journals through lens of cos- mopolitanism as an emergent framework for understanding transnational political agency. The two chapters in third section are used to explore a broad range of approaches to subjectivity and media-based agency, as well as media and communication research.This is a very well-written book. Its style is accessible, and while Dahlgren clearly has his own well-developed and critical perspective on most of issues he explores, his treatment of scholars and traditions they represent is respectful, even when their contributions are being subjected to extended critique. For example, in chapter on democracy, participation, and media, Dahlgren finds numerous opportunities to remind reader that politics, democratic or not, is about exercise of power. After an extended presentation of different that are thought to explain why young people do, or do not, engage in political activity, Dahlgren accepts that levels of participation reflect subjective identities and dispositions that might, or might not, find support within civic culture, but ultimately has to do with power relations. He then proceeds to discuss how it is that we continue to struggle with limited success in incorporating power into our versions of democratic theory.Dahlgren is especially critical of present state of thinking about social capital. In his chapter on web environment, he refers to version of social capital attrib- uted to Robert Putnam as a Trojan Horse. In part, his critique of this economic meta- phor emerges from his deep-seated concern about impact that neoliberal political project has had in a variety of societal domains in which market fundamental- ism degrades social. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,042
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,142

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,010
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0050,004
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0420,025

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,333
Écart entre enseignants0,314 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournalism & Mass Communication QuarterlyMême sujetSocial Media and PoliticsTravaux en français237 207