Notice bibliographique
Résumé
On behalf of the Board of Editors for Volume 28 of the Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal, I wish to extend thanks to our readers for their continued support, and to describe some of the many changes and new initiatives the Journal has undertaken this year. As our readers are aware, and our alumni are fond to tell, The Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal was launched by a group of dedicated students with the support and encouragement of Professor Kenneth Manaster, and began publishing articles in 1985. (2) For the Journal's 25th Anniversary, Professor Tyler Ochoa emphasized how the Journal had progressed its modest beginnings to its current position among the premiere law-and-technology and intellectual property journals in the United States because of the work of its (student) editors and staff throughout the years. (3) Volume 27 of the Journal was published as the Santa Clara University School of Law celebrated its 100th Anniversary. In the Preface to Volume 27, Dean Donald Polden described a role of the Journal as adding to the store of knowledge on law, society, and (4) He also commented that our annual symposium addresses a topic of significant national, and increasingly global, significance. (5) The Board of Editors for Volume 28 is excited to continue to strive for global impact, addressing issues at the nexus of technology, law, and policy. Contributors to Volume 28 include Giancarlo Frosio (from Italy), (6) Ron Bouchard (from Canada), (7) and Eldar Haber (from Israel). (8) This year's symposium, entitled International Intellectual Property--Is the IP World Flat?, addressed international perspectives on patent, trademark and privacy law and featured speakers from as far away as China. (9) The Board of Editors for Volume 28 is immensely proud to be able to contribute to the Journal's tradition, and is thankful for our special community of supporters, readers and alumni. One advantage of a student-run journal is that every year we get to harness the creativity and energy of a new group of dedicated students. (10) Thus, we have made changes with a nod to tradition but capitalizing on that enthusiasm. The most obvious change, of course, is the cover design. We chose the new color scheme to identify more closely with Santa Clara University School of Law as a whole. And yet we retain the open book logo introduced for the 20th Anniversary of the Journal. Over time, this will strengthen our brand and yet acknowledge our heritage, which is so important to us. Santa Clara Law has enabled another impending change: the Digital Commons webpages, which will increase our web presence, and hence visibility and search-ability of our articles. (11) Web presence helps with our ranking, which is based on citations to our articles. (12) Overall, we seek to develop a consistent look and feel to the Journal whether readers pick up the physical print copy or if they reach us through the website. Finally, the cover changes, and other subtle printing changes, have reduced production costs. We feel this is responsible stewardship of the Journal, since over time, demand for an online edition continues to increase even as demand for the traditional print version decreases. In addition, Volume 28 is working to develop a Kindle format for the Journal, and we hope to roll that out this year. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,014 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,023 | 0,013 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».