<em>Zimbabwe's Exodus: Crisis, Migration</em>, Survival, Jonathan Crush and Daniel Tevera, eds.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Zimbabwe’s Exodus: Crisis, Migration, Survival Stephen Agyepong Crush, Jonathan, and Daniel Tevera, eds. 2010. Zimbabwe’s Exodus: Crisis, Migration, Survival. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Center; and Cape Town: Southern African Migration Programme. 416 pp. On various occasions and in varied circumstances, many regions of Africa have noted the forced migration, exile, and voluntary departures of individuals searching for economic opportunity and stability. Under Idi Amin’s rule in Uganda, persons of Asian descent were forced to flee in droves. In Ghana, a governmental policy led to the departure of other West Africans, including numerous Nigerians, during the Progress Part administration of Prime Minister Kofi Abrefa Busia. In Zimbabwe’s Exodus: Crisis, Migration, Survival, coeditors Jonathan Crush and Daniel Tevera detail the ongoing crisis in Zimbabwe, which has led to “an unprecedented exodus of over a million desperate people from all strata of [the] Zimbabwean diaspora.” Importantly, the high quality of the contents shows that the coeditors of the book and the contributors are top migration scholars, including diaspora-based Zimbabwean scholars. Their efforts are to explore the relationship between the economic and political crisis and migration from Zimbabwe. The accounts, including personal stories, are seen as a survival strategy. The profound stories reported in the volume detail the hostility and xenophobia that individuals often experienced outside their own environments. Divided into seventeen chapters, Zimbabwe’s Exodus has an excellent foreword, written by Vice President Lauchlan T. Munro of the International Development Research Center (IDRC) of Ottawa, Canada. Munro contends that “Stories about migration are full of stereotypes and oversimplification,” and “Zimbabwe’s Exodus: Crisis, Migration, Survival is both an easy and challenging book to read” (p. ix). He adds that his center “has supported several research projects on migration in recent years, including this one. I am delighted to see this fine collection in print.” To make the book accessible to all and sundry, as well as to confirm IDRC Vice President Munro’s assessment about the easiness of the book, the authors have provided a detailed list of acronyms (pp. xii–xiv). [End Page 112] Instead of an author’s preface or introduction, editors Crush and Tevera have provided a detailed first chapter, subtitled “Exiting Zimbabwe” (pp. 1–49). There, they explain the puzzle about what they term a “mass out-migration,” which is “a perfectly predictable consequence of Zimbabwe’s economic and social collapse” (p. 1). In explaining further, they add “the Zimbabwe government’s political actions and the country’s decline have led to their economic destitution and desperation” (p. 1). All seventeen chapters offer food for thought and are well researched and written. Certain chapters are quite useful, including Alois S. Mlambo’s “A History of Zimbabwe Migration to 1990” (chapter two). For scholars interested in transnational migration, Alice Bloch in chapter six details the experiences of Zimbabweans in Britain. That chapter dovetails with JoAnn McGregor’s chapter (seven) on Zimbabwean migrants and the UK care industry. Although some black migrants in South Africa—including African Americans—have in the past complained about various forms of mistreatment, chapters nine, ten, and eleven discuss aspects of the Zimbabwean migration to South Africa (pp. 225–290). Chapter eleven, for example, is about female aspects of migration in South Africa, “The Voices of Migrant Zimbabwean Women in South Africa.” As with problems of illegal immigration in other countries, the migration story in South Africa has its own fragments. In chapter fifteen, France Maphosa discusses “Transnationalism and Undocumented Migration between Rural Zimbabwe and South Africa” (pp. 363–376). In chapter seventeen, Tara Polzer discusses “Silence and Fragmentation: South African Responses to Zimbabwean migration” (pp. 377–399). Readers are provided with a detailed list of contributors so that they can appreciate the other contributors, who may otherwise not be covered in a succinct review. The index (pp. 401–416) is useful, as it covers topical items, including names and places. Zimbabwe’s Exodus should be a useful book for general readers and experts whose fields of research and inquiry have been covered by the contributors. [End Page 113] Stephen Agyepong Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology Kumasi, Ghana Copyright © 2011 Indiana University Press
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».