MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1494153046

Richard Ericson: An Appreciation

2007· article· en· W1494153046 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Garland

Notice bibliographique

RevueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiquePolitics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGratitudeScholarshipFriendshipExcellenceSociologyPsychoanalysisMentorshipGreatnessCreativitySupporterGriffinCompassionTributeHumilityConsolationMedia studiesPsychologyLawClassicsArt historySocial scienceHistoryArtLiteratureSocial psychologyPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This is a surpassingly sad occasion. But it is a consolation to be able to commemorate Richard's remarkable life and the rich legacy he left behind him. Amidst our grief, we can celebrate the lasting gifts Richard made to the world of scholarship and learning. Many of Richard's colleagues and friends have traveled far to be here today. Many others, when they learned that I would be speaking, wrote to me to convey their distress at the news, to extol the virtues of the man they knew, and to express their gratitude for the gifts he gave them. In my remarks I will try to express some of the sentiments that they conveyed. Like Richard's book projects, which often unfolded in three separate volumes, I am going to address three themes of Richard's life and work: a) Richard as a colleague, an academic friend, an encourager and supporter of others; b) Richard as a scholar, a sociologist, and a criminologist; and c) Richard as a builder of institutions, an effective force for change who enhanced the academic world to which he devoted his working life. These themes are interwoven, of course. Each of them is marked by Richard's creativity and energy, by his striving for excellence and ever-higher standards, and by his quiet professionalism and personal integrity. I To begin with my own impressions: I knew Richard well, though not nearly as well as many in this room. Our friendship began in the early 1980s when he first invited me to Toronto and developed over the course of many subsequent visits to the Centre and to Green College. Our friendship was one of these long-distance, collegial relationships that are such an enjoyable and enriching aspect of academic life. We had several things that drew us together: not just the worlds of criminology on either side of the Atlantic but also other, more personal connections, not least our shared loyalty and affection for Derick McClintock, who had been Richard's PhD supervisor in Cambridge and was my head of department for many years in Edinburgh. I found Richard friendly, and easy to be with. One might infer from his remarkable productivity that he was driven and ambitious, but in person (at least to me) he always seemed relaxed, mellow, and to be enjoying himself. He enjoyed conversation and was good at it. He was a thoughtful and generous host. He had a wry sense of humour, a developed capacity for irony, and he liked to laugh--sometimes with a barely suppressed giggle that shook his tall frame and made him seem suddenly boyish. For someone who was so accomplished and successful, he was surprisingly modest and self-deprecating. He told stories against himself. He refrained from name-dropping. He made no effort to impress. He seemed very secure and never the least bit pompous or self-important. When Richard's friends and colleagues wrote to me, their impressions were very much the same. The words that recur over and over again in their letters are: gracious, helpful, warm, ... To those of us fortunate enough to know him well, he was not only a brilliant scholar, but a loyal, generous, self-effacing and kind friend with a wonderfully wry sense of humour. Pat O'Malley, Sydney University Richard was outstandingly nice, as well as richly creative. David Downes, London School of Economics [Richard was] a wonderful teacher and mentor to students of all ages and stages from across the world. A person who delighted in bringing people together for debate, discussion and the interchange of ideas, whose conferences, workshops and other events were always enjoyable and productive. And a loyal and generous friend, ever supportive. Nikolas Rose, London School of Economics I am not going to say much about Richard's mentoring of graduate students and younger colleagues: Kevin Haggerty, who knows as much about this as anyone, will be talking in a moment. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,063
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,210

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,001
Communication savante0,0060,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0630,035

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,031
Tête enseignante GPT0,278
Écart entre enseignants0,247 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Même sujetPolitics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle EastTravaux en français237 207