Ben Jonson and Theatre: Performance, Practice, and Theory
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Richard Cave, author of an exceptionally lively introduction to Ben Jonson published a decade ago, now returns with several colleagues to offer the first book-length consideration of Jonson's current theatrical potential.Performance histories have been published before, but no book prior to this one has attempted to explore the possibilities of Jonson's living presence on the stage today.We can only hope that the work of Cave and his co-authors will lead to more frequent and varied stagings of Jonson's plays and to fuller appreciation of his works as pieces of theatre.The present volume, inspired by a conference at Reading University in January 1996, offers an eclectic mixture of short papers, longer articles, brief inductions and interludes, and substantive interviews, so that some of the energy of the original event is conveyed by the text itself.The volume opens with a traditional academic essay by Andrew Gurr, who explores the relevance of the Blackfriars setting of The Alchemist and offers the somewhat startling suggestion that the character of Lovewit may have been based on a colleague of Jonson's named William Shakespeare.Gurr's argument is, of course, necessarily speculative, but it is buttressed by strong evidence elsewhere of Jonson's interest in Shakespeare as both an artist and a man.Meanwhile, Richard Cave opens the heart of the book with a series of chapters on such matters as "script and performance," "visualizing Jonson's text," "designing for Jonson's plays," "directing Jonson," and "acting in Jonson's plays."The last-named section consists of a conversation with John Nettles and Simon Russell-Beale.During the course of these sections Cave comments on the practical usefulness of Jonson's stage directions; on the theatrical significance of the complex typographical layout of the original printings; and on the subtle theatrical clues embedded in the text of The Alchemist.Cave also discusses Jonson's use of the physical aspects of his contemporary stage; the ways such stagings affect our responses to particular plays; the ways Jonson uses the sheer size of the stage; how he dealt with dramatic transformations; and the relevance of dramatic staging to thematic "meaning."Here as in Cave's earlier book, one senses a scholar with a real appreciation of Jonson as a living (or potentially living) force.Cave also discusses the history of recent productions of Jonson, arguing that the most successful stagings have been those with a clear focus, uncluttered designs, and the maximum amount of contact between actors and audience.Matthew Warchus's productions are particularly praised, and one can easily imagine how reading this book would benefit future directors, actors, and designers, especially since the publishers have generously included a large number of helpful photographs.Brian Woolland's contributions have, if anything, a more immediately theatrical feel to them even than Cave's, especially in their chatty tone, improvisational
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,011 | 0,045 |
| Communication savante | 0,016 | 0,007 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,007 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».