MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1494676796

Suddenly They Heard Footsteps: Storytelling for the Twenty-first Century (review)

2009· article· en· W1494676796 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kay Stone

Notice bibliographique

RevueMarvels & Tales · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueDigital Storytelling and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésStorytellingAdventureNarrativeHistoryParagraphLiteratureMedia studiesArt historyArtSociologyComputer scienceWorld Wide Web
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

They Heard Footsteps: Storytelling for the Twenty-first Century. By Dan Yashinsky. fackson: University Press of Mississippi, 2004. xviii + 317 pp. Yashinsky calls himself a storm fool, a wanderer who carries tales from one place another, often blown in by bad weather. This modern-day storyteller from Toronto has fooled himself through Canada and the United States and across the great ocean. In the first 184 pages he describes his narrative adventures, interwoven with suggestions on the art of storytelling. next 60 pages are devoted seven original texts, including his book-length tale The Storyteller at Fault (published under the same title by Ragweed Press in 1992). He proposes a challenging quest, to find the that will mend the world, and details his own personal odyssey over almost three decades as internationally recognized storyteller, organizer, and prolific writer. This book, his sixth, offers a passionate retrospective of his own work. What it lacks in scholarly notations and indexes is partially balanced by his direct experiences and examples. He does include annotated list of works cited and a useful ten-page discussion of storytelling resources, emphasizing books that have influenced him directly. Throughout the book Yashinsky never strays far from his own frankly subjective thoughts and experiences, which are often both entertaining and illuminating. For example, in his one -paragraph Afterword he describes a young listener who shouts out, Never finish! and brings it back this book's title by suggesting that stories let us hear the footsteps of own transformation coming towards us on the pathway of everyday life (293). This personal approach is both the strength and the weakness of They Heard Footsteps. Dan Yashinsky is engaging writer and teller, which makes much of the book a pleasure read. It flows from one chapter another, covering topics that have fascinated him throughout his long career, especially the importance of skilled mentors as models and trainers, the place of community as the lifeblood of storytelling (as it always has been), the abiding value of careful listening by tellers and listeners, and of course the themselves. He is also very fond of the guiding metaphor of Scheherazade as a life-saving storyteller. Yashinsky plays with endless variations on these themes throughout the book in his zeal stress the importance of and storytelling. In his preface Yashinsky situates his book among our common elders, especially Ruth Sawyer, whose seminal book, Way of the Storyteller (1942), was one of the sparks for educated tellers in schools and libraries in the early part of the twentieth century. Sawyer and more recent tellers/writers like Toronto's Alice Kane and Joan Bodger were central in making storytelling a living art for centuries (xvii). Yashinsky also honors oral masters like Angela Sidney, a Tagish elder from the Yukon, and Joe Neil MacNeil, a master teller in Gaelic from Cape Breton Island, Nova Scotia. At times Yashinsky suggests that his own book is an honour song for storytelling ancestors and invitation for you join the circle (xviii), a sentiment that is most familiar in selfconscious contemporary storytelling. In his introductory chapter, Suddenly They Heard Footsteps, he relates one of many of his family anecdotes: His three-year-old son was drifting off sleep as the boy's mother told him a deliberately monotonous story about various animals falling asleep. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,750
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,881

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,062
Tête enseignante GPT0,375
Écart entre enseignants0,313 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMarvels & TalesMême sujetDigital Storytelling and EducationTravaux en français237 207