On Narrative Expectations: Greenlandic Oral Traditions about the Cultural Encounter between Inuit and Norsemen
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
AMONG ARCHEOLOGISTS as well as Eskimologists, the Greenlandic stories about cultural contact and hostilities between Inuit and Norsemen have long been disputed. Today no one believes that Inuit attacks on the Norsemen were the sole reason for the disappearance of both the Western (Nuuk/Godthab) and Eastern (Qaqortoq/Julianehab) Settlements. Recent research rejects these stories as sources of insight into the Middle Ages, though discussion of the narrative expectations associated with them and the role they play is important in understanding the Inuit storytelling tradition. And though they cannot be considered as sources of historical insight into the medieval encounters between Inuit and Norsemen (qallunaatsiaat), a careful consideration of these expectations will prove to be an excellent source for the history of the encounters in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries between the Greenlandic Inuit and the Europeans (qallunaat). H.J. RINK AND THE COLLECTION OF THE GREENLANDIC ORAL TRADITION Contrary to the widely held view in Europe, literacy was relatively widespread in Greenland as early as the middle of the nineteenth century. The trained catechists were able to write extended texts in different genres such as sermons and personal letters. Fortunately they also turned their to attention to recording their oral traditions in writing and in doing so remained close to the codified language typical of oral performance. The first collection with which the Greenlanders were involved was made in northern Greenland in 1823-28 by the Danish priest, Peder Kragh (1793-1883). He, however, never saw the project through to publication but forwarded the entire collection to Hinrich Rink (1819-93), who between 1858 and 1868 made the first large-scale, systematic collection of Greenlandic oral traditions. With a background in the natural sciences, Rink went to Greenland for the first time in 184-8 in order to pursue a mineralogical/geological investigation of the island's resources. Upon his return to Denmark after three years of study, he gained employment with the Commission for the Administration of Greenland and was initially posted to the south of the island. In 1853, he was appointed administrator of Julianehab and took up residence in Greenland on a more permanent basis. By this juncture in his career, he had traveled the whole of Danish western Greenland from the north to the south. On the basis of these travels, Rink wrote a detailed description of the area covering all its features from geography and climate through products and resources to the inhabitants and their lifestyle. The compendium was published as Gronland geographisk og statistisk beskrevet 1-2, 1857 (revised English version: Danish Greenland: Its People and its Products, 1877). As a result of these journeys, Rink knew that the Greenlanders were able to read and write and that they were eager to obtain new and more varied reading material. In 1855 Rink moved to Nuuk/Godthab and became inspector (a leading administrator) of southern Greenland. (1) During the winter of 1856-57, he was on a leave in Denmark, where he acquired a small printing press and an even smaller lithographic press, which accompanied him upon his return to Greenland. In an invitation dated April 22, 1858, Rink issued a call for written narratives and illustrations that could entertain and instruct the Greenlanders. High among his desiderata were Gronlandske Sagn eller Digtninger, som nu vedligeholdes blandt Beboerne af visse Egne ved mundtlig Fortaelling eller Sang (Greenlandic legends or poetic works that still might be retained by the inhabitants of certain localities in Greenland as either oral narration or song). (2) This collection of the oral traditions became part of a multi-faceted national project. Rink also established a series of local councils in which leading hunters took part in the administration of their own community--forstanderskaber--to educate the Greenlanders and return to them some of the political power they had lost as a result of colonization. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,016 | 0,025 |
| Communication savante | 0,010 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».