Preface: Symposium on Stegosauria proceedings
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Stegosauria, the plated dinosaurs, are medium to large-sized quadrupedal herbivorous ornithischians. They figureprominently in the history of dinosaur palaeontologybecause of their bizarre appearance: large body, tiny skullwithsmallcrenulatedteeth,hindlegstallerthantheforelegs,two rows of dorsally projecting erect dermal plates along theback and tail, and spikes at the end of the tail (Carpenter andGalton 2001). The most famous genus commonly used fortoys, movies, and known by many children (and adults!) isStegosaurus (‘‘roof lizard’’). It was named as early as 1877by O. C. Marsh from fossils of the Late Jurassic of westernNorth America. Most of the major features of our currentviewofStegosauruswerealreadyinplacewhenO.C.Marsh(1891) published the first skeletal reconstruction. Nonethe-less, from that time on, plated dinosaurs have been the least-studied dinosaurs and their incredible diversity has onlyrecently been recognized (Carpenter 2001). Meanwhile,stegosaurs have been recovered from all northern hemi-sphere continents and Africa. They are temporally restrictedto the Middle Jurassic to Early Cretaceous (Galton andUpchurch 2004; Maidment et al. 2008), with no definitivestegosaurian material known with confidence in youngersediments from anywhere in the world. In Switzerland, onlyone stegosaur bone (a proximal end of a femur) is known sofar (Meyer and Hunt 1998).Since 1990, the Sauriermusem Aathal carries out exca-vations in the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of theHowe-Stephens and Howe-Scott quarries (Howe Ranch,Big Horn Mountains, Wyoming, USA) (Ayer 2000).Besides the famous discoveries of specimens of Allosaurus,Diplodocus,orCamarasaurus some of the most completestegosaur skeletons of the world were also excavated overthe years. They include four specimens of stegosauridsreferred to cf. Stegosaurus armatus and Hesperosaurusmjosi, and nicknamed ‘‘Sarah’’, ‘‘Moritz’’ (Fig. 1), ‘‘Lilly’’,and ‘‘Victoria’’ (Siber and Mo¨ckli 2009). The latter spec-imen is nearly complete and includes an exquisitely-preserved skull, several hand-sized patches of skinimpressions, and several pronounced pathologies.Since many years Hans Jakob ‘‘Kirby’’ Siber, director ofthe Sauriermuseum Aathal, undertakes great efforts to makeaccessible the museum collection for scientific research, andit was the Sauriermuseum, which organized and financed the‘‘Symposium on Stegosauria’’. The main purpose of the‘‘Symposium on Stegosauria’’ was to bring together leadingstegosaurspecialists(http://www.sauriermuseum.ch/Dstegosymp.htm) from different parts of the world (Canada,Denmark, France, Germany, Japan, Portugal, Spain, Swit-zerland, UK, USA), in order to discuss recent advances andfuture directions in stegosaur research. Another purpose wasto study and discuss the extraordinary Aathal specimens,some of which are now on display in a special exhibition ofthe Sauriermuseum.During the symposium, 19 talks were given, covering abroad spectrum of research on stegosaur palaeontology suchas: history of discoveries and research, new finds, taxonomyandphylogeny,bonehistologyandontogeny,biomechanics,ichnology, taphonomy, and palaeoecology. Martin Sander(University of Bonn) chaired the sessions and there wasplenty of time for interesting and animated discussions.Eight contributions are presented in the proceedings, anumber of which re-evaluate historical finds, describe newfinds, highlight the difficulties in the––palaeontological––species concept of stegosaurs, and discuss taxonomy and
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle