MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1497259537

Montefalco School for Women: An Opus Dei Institution in Mexico

2012· article· en· W1497259537 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Virginia Ávila García

Notice bibliographique

RevueResources for feminist research · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueCatholicism and Religious Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOpusSociologyCharismaIdeologyInstitutionContext (archaeology)Gender studiesHegemonyReligious studiesHumanitiesLawPolitical sciencePoliticsHistorySocial scienceArt historyArtPhilosophy
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This article examines education of women within Opus Dei by focusing on educational model used within Montefalco (1) School for Women. As part of Opus Dei's work, school obeys and is fully integrated with organization's guiding ideology referred to as of God or just the Work. (2) This study is based on my previous work (3) on Opus Dei's clergy as well as on fieldwork and archival work. I also used interviews with women who were associated with different charismatic (divine) categories of this religious group as well as ample literature published by Opus Dei. I begin with some of historical context for this organization in Mexico. Obeying orders of founding priest, Josemaria Escriva de Balaguer y Albas, first group of Spanish women associated with Opus Dei arrived in Mexico in March 1950. They were expressly charged with care and management of all housing used by organization's members (4). Opus Dei had been in Mexico since 1948, doing proselytizing work on behalf of organization. This group of women was called Opus Dei's feminine section, and was made up of three young women who were under orders of Guadalupe Ortiz de Landazuri. From time it was created, the has been characterized by its support of theological directives coming from Vatican (5) that promote masculine and feminine identities based on gender difference and principles of complementarity of men and women. (6) These identities were developed within core of institution--the founding priest occupied a hegemonic space as institution's patriarch, a role now exercised by clergy. It is men, as priests and members, who occupy positions of power and control. Women occupy secondary places and their function is to reproduce institution's ideology and gender roles within education. Women are in charge of administrative and housekeeping duties for institution's houses, visitors' accommodations, schools, retirement centres and so on. Opus Dei is a conservative organization that promotes an ideology of social conformity that is justified as way in which spiritual peace can be achieved by its followers. (7) It reaffirms social differences by demanding an uncritical adherence to productive and reproductive functions of men and women that do not change their position in society. To achieve harmony and avoid conflict, difference in terms of gender, social class and ethnicity is handled by separating men from women, rich from poor, and whites from indigenous persons. These daily practices show how ideology of the is based on a hierarchical social order that is authoritarian, sexist, classist and racist. The Opus Dei in Mexico, given its religious position and conservative ideology, identifies with upper echelons of country's ecclesiastical hierarchy and politically aligns itself with right wing governments. In recent past however, it has managed to maintain good relations with PRI (8) governments. It rejects theology of liberation, (9) claiming that it is discriminatory, while maintaining a preference for upper class catholic members (10). When we take a closer look at educational practices of the Work of God by focusing on Montefalco School for Women, we can appreciate way in which gender intersects with other social categories like class and ethnicity. (11) The way in which this intersectionality manifests itself within practices of school can be seen in particular roles that women are assigned depending on their social class, their status within the Work, and their ethnicity. Upper class women maintain social order through their philanthropic role formalized via a women's board called, Asociacion Cultural Universal, A.C. (Universal Cultural Association) where numerary and supernumerary (12) members are in charge of fundraising for school as well as manage and plan activities related to it. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,088
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,175

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0080,002
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,115
Tête enseignante GPT0,374
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResources for feminist researchMême sujetCatholicism and Religious StudiesTravaux en français237 207