Syndromes Associated with Intracranial Tumours: A Paediatric Neurosurgeon’s Perspective
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
rare and may be the result of chance rather than some increased risk for both conditions.In terms of the current chapter, these three disorders, as well as more-recently described phakomatoses, share the property of being associated with an increased risk of malignancies involving the central and, sometimes, peripheral nervous system. NeurofibromatosisNeurofibromatosis (NF) is the most common of all the phakomatosis syndromes, having been initially described by Frederick von Recklinghausen in the year 1882 (Crump, 1981).Also initially called von Recklinghausen's disease, the disorder received public attention in the highly-acclaimed 1981 movie, The Elephant Man, which portrayed the life of Joseph Merrick (who was erroneously called John in the film); though some controversy exists as to whether Merrick truly suffered from neurofibromatosis, another condition called Proteus syndrome, or some combination of the two (Legendre et al., 2011).For the purposes of this chapter, what is most significant is that, whereas CNS tumours are the rule in both types of neurofibromatosis, Proteus Syndrome generally is not associated with CNS tumours (Satter, 2007).Proteus syndrome is also much less common than neurofibromatosis, with a prevalence of less than one in one million (Legendre et al., 2011).In fact, neurofibromatosis is now recognized not to be one, but at least two distinct disorders: neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) and neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF-2) (Ferner, 2007).Each of these two syndromes has its own diagnostic criteria that are very different; and whereas the characteristic lesion in NF-1 is the neurofibroma, the characteristic lesion in NF-2 is a peripheral nerve Schwannoma or neurolemoma (Pearce, 2003;Ferner, 2007;Lu-Emerson and Plotkin, 2009a;Lu-Emerson and Plotkin, 2009b).Neurofibromatosis has been further subcategorized beyond just neurofibromatosis types 1 and 2, into milder and more severe forms of NF-2 (Gardner syndrome and Wishart or Lee-Abbott Syndrome, respectively); segmental NF-1 and NF-2; and other variants of NF, including mixed NF.All forms of the disease appear to be autosomal dominant, though they are phenotypically highly variable, in terms of the presenting features and syndrome severity, even within a given family and when comparing monozygotic twins, suggesting the involvement of other disease-modifying genes and/or additional non-hereditary influences like second hit somatic events, environmental agents, epigenetic modification, and post-zygotic mutations (Rieley et al., 2011).This makes it difficult to advise parents regarding the risk to their future offspring, because a parent with very mild disease may have a child with severe involvement, or vice versa. Neurofibromatosis type 1Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) is the most common form of disease, affecting one in roughly 2500 to 5000 live births (Evans et al., 2010;Ferner et al., 2007;Legendre et al., 2011).This renders it more than ten times more common than NF-2(Evans et al., 2010;Ferner et al., 2007).Though autosomal dominant, up to 50% of cases arise spontaneously from a gene mutation that occurs on chromosome 17q11.2,which encodes for a large protein called neurofibromin (Evans et al., 2010;Legendre et al., 2011).This NF-1 gene is a classical tumour suppressor gene, with tumour growth requiring the loss of BOTH alleles.Neurofibromatosis type 1 has a classical combination of clinical signs (Ferner, 2010), for which the mnemonic CHANSOR has been used.These signs include Café au lait macules; Hamartomas of the iris (called Lisch nodules); Axillary and Inguinal Freckling; www.intechopen.com
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».