MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1499176994

Gender Differences in Academic Performance at Unam

2012· article· en· W1499176994 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Valeria Millan, Elodia Villaseñor, Nieves Martínez de la Escalera, Humberto Carrillo-Calvet

Notice bibliographique

RevueResources for feminist research · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueEducational Outcomes and Influences
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNorm (philosophy)InformaticsMathematics educationPsychologyPolitical scienceSociologyPedagogyEconomic growthLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This article analyzes the academic trajectories of more than 39.000 undergraduate students in the Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico (UNAM) (National Autonomous University of Mexico). In the search for differences, we demonstrate that some socio-economic factors have a differentiated impact in the academic performance of women and men. analysis is assisted with computational intelligence techniques implemented in ViBlioSOM, a software system developed by our team. This informatics tool allowed us to automate some phases of the study, generating and analyzing cartographies or knowledge maps. which visually represent the processed information of five student cohorts. We validate our methodology verifying the effect of known factors of academic performance and then use it to discover new ones that are also associated with differences. Introduction Access to education as well as the increase of female participation in elementary and high school levels has become a priority on the worldwide agenda, as can well be deduced from The Development Millennium Goals. This 1990 report from the conference Education for All (EFA), held in Jomtien, Thailand, addressed concerns of discrimination and educational inequity that persists between men and women in Third World countries. A decade later, the EFA's 2002 Global Monitoring Report presented an encouraging, but not yet satisfactory, panorama when stating that gender equality is possible, but it is still far from being the global norm (Rihani, 2006). More recently, in 2009, the EFA recognized that it had been unable to totally fulfill its goal of eliminating disparity in elementary school and high school levels in 2005 as it had committed to do, and now restates its commitment to do so by 2015 (UNESCO, 2007). desire to achieve equality becomes obvious in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the UNESCO convention related to the Struggle against Discrimination in the Educational Sphere (1960), and the International Pact for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (1966), and it is confirmed once again in the Declaration of the World Conference on Higher Education (CMES) as the ruling principle: every person is entitled to have access to university or college education. This right, to which every person is entitled, regardless of gender, was set as an established goal for the year 2010. In this last declaration, it was established that the goal for 2010 would be to increase, by a specific percentage for each country, the access to education to all persons ranging between 18 and 24 years of age, which is equivalent to an increase of at least 30 percent of the number of people who had access to higher education at the moment of this encounter (UNESCO, 1998). Today, it has been calculated that 54 percent of young people living in member countries of the Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) will have access to university or college-level educational programs, supposing that the entry rates maintain the same pattern that have shown up until now. Even if the trend in most countries is a notable increase of students who are the first generation of their families to have access to Type A (university level), post-secondary education, in Mexico only 30 percent of its youth will attain this access to college or university education, and that with a 69 percent completion rate. (1) common tendency in the past five years indicates a slight increase but still keeps us far from achieving the proposed 2010 goal proposed by the CMES, as can be seen in the following graphic. [FIGURE 1 OMITTED] Although access to higher education in Mexico is one of the lowest, followed by Turkey, the proportion in which both men and women enter college or university education is similar, which shows a relative progress of sorts. This tendency manifests itself when comparing the educational profile of today's 25-year-old adult population with the 65-year-old generation in which 18 percent of men studied college or university careers, while only 12 percent of women did so. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,048

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,275
Tête enseignante GPT0,487
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueResources for feminist researchMême sujetEducational Outcomes and InfluencesTravaux en français237 207