MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1501013933

Myth and Ritual in Liam O'Flaherty's Short Story "Spring Sowing"

2007· article· en· W1501013933 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Afroditi Panaghis

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational fiction review · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueJungian Analytical Psychology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMythologyPsychicHonorPsycheLiteratureRealmDreamAestheticsPsychoanalysisSociologyPhilosophyPsychologyHistoryArt
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

aim of this article is to read short story Spring Sowing (1924), written by renowned Irish writer Liam O'Flaherty, in context of psychology as well as myth and ritual. In process, it will become apparent that story depicts not only annual agricultural rites performed by man for centuries in honor of cosmic forces that bring renewal to earth, but also inner workings of characters. selection of particular short story is two-pronged: First, it provides a wide range of themes that are found in writer's work; and second, it reflects most successfully author's vision. It is my contention that O'Flaherty's attempt to help modern man gain insight into basic forces that underline human psyche led him to borrow from Carl Jung concept of masculine/feminine principles. Furthermore, in order to concretize his viewpoint he employed principles as psychic structures, and fused them with myth and ritual, thus rendering his story universal in its appeal and involving both male and female readers. Finally, it should be noted that a handful of critics have written on O'Flaherty's work but no one has dealt with particular story, an oversight that present contribution intends to amend. In story, protagonist, Martin, represents masculine principle that includes logic and reason while Mary, his wife, stands for feminine principle that suggests imagination, creativity, and intuition. (1) O'Flaherty, however, convinced that it not enough to provide a psychological/archetypal framework for his story, and to define psychic structures only. He needed more than just concepts derived from Jung. This realization drove him to recur to ritualistic constructs with which to blend Jungian ideas, to strengthen story's framework, and most importantly, to convey complexity of his vision. Thus, Martin stands for and Mary for earth. Heaven and declares Mircea Eliade, form Androgeny, which is an archaic and universal formula for expression of wholeness, co-existence of contraries or coincidentia oppositorum. It symbolizes perfection of a primordial non-conditioned state. (2) Eliade argues that separation of from earth manifests itself in human forms of man and woman. (3) He also postulates that rituals connected with Terra Mater reveal the mystery of how Life born from a seed hidden in an undifferentiated whole. In addition, these rituals also show how life was produced in consequence of hierogamy between and Earth, and how it sprang from a violent death, in most cases voluntary. (4) In rituals that relate to Terra Mater and goddess of telluric fecundity where goddesses of vegetation and of agriculture are present, woman plays a significant role. Therefore, one cannot miss symbolic assimilation of woman with land and of sexual act with agricultural labor. The woman is field and male is bestower of seed, writes Indian poet Narada. (5) In this light, author obliged to use notion of duality to delineate breakdown that occurs between characters. By using analogies like day and night as well as a bright day-world (the events in field) and a dark night-world (the episode in barn), writer projects conscious and unconscious as well as and Earth. As article will show, O'Flaherty shares in Jung's belief that suppression of feminine principle is an act that results in conflict and imbalance. He proceeds to objectify this belief by expounding idea that youth and age, birth and death are part of a perpetual universal myth that focuses on man's intrinsic bond to earth. All along, artist stresses fact that modern man refuses to accept power of earth and nature, hence bringing about discord and sorrow. O'Flaherty, like William Wordsworth before him, believes that nature is a teacher, a guide, and a source of spirituality. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,876
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,036
Tête enseignante GPT0,395
Écart entre enseignants0,360 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational fiction reviewMême sujetJungian Analytical PsychologyTravaux en français237 207