Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It is such a pleasure to address an audience openly celebrating children's literature, where no one is ashamed of delighting in children's stories, and where no one wishes to ha ve grown-up covers for children's books, as though reading children's literature is a slightly dirty habit that must be hidden at all costs.I also write adult fiction, under a pseudonym Rachna Mara.My one collection of adult short fiction, Of Customs and Excise, came out in 1991.When I meet with other writers, particularly those who write adult fiction but not children's stories, I almost inevitably get probed, either directly or obliquely, as to why it's been so long since I wrote adult fiction.Some people go for the flattering approach: "I hope you're not going to give up writing adult fiction, Rachna.I'd love to see what else you could write-a novel maybe?Of course," they continue, "I know you've been writing children's stories, and I know there have been some awards and well..." Often, at this point they trail off before rushing on, "Not that children's writing isn't important, but, it's just, well, your collection of short stories was so good."No one has come right out with it, but what they're thinking is: when are you going back to the stuff that matters?When are you going back to the Grown-up stuff?Yes, yes, we know children's writing is necessary, but all those picture books, well, anyone can dash them off and so...But children's literature is so much more than a lower or less-skilled or less-insightful version of adult fiction.We know this because if we are asked to remember books that resonate within us, we almost always come up with some titles that we have read as children.The impact of children's fiction, of books we read as children, reverberates through our lives far more than the books we read as adults.I certainly do not consider writing for children a lesser form of my art.The process of creating is the same, whether it's writing for children or adults.It seems to me that as writers, we are co-ordinators of images, directing the mind towards a new way of looking at a particular situation in life.We examine the plethora of images, experiences, ideas, thoughts, feelings and dreams in our lives-the whole mess and mass of them that swirl and flow disconnectedly in the untidy way that life works-and we select certain ones, linking them to tell a tale.We juxtapose them in new ways, weaving strands of seemingly unconnected images from far and wide to say: look do you see how it works?Did you think of it this way?For me, personally, to begin any piece of writing is an act of faith.I have to trust the links my
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,011 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,015 |
| Communication savante | 0,015 | 0,017 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,008 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».