Recognizing Aboriginal Title: The Mabo Case and Indigenous Resistance to English Settler Colonialism
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Recognizing Aboriginal Title: The Mabo Case and Indigenous Resistance to English Settler Colonialism. Peter H. Russell. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2005. 470 pp. $65.00 hc. In Recognizing Aboriginal Title: The Mabo Case and Indigenous Resistance to English-Settler Colonialism, Peter H. Russell examines background and impact of two intertwined Australian legal cases, Mabo (Nos. 1 and 2). These cases centered on Indigenous land rights, and their decisions continue to have precedent-setting and far-reaching political, social, economic, and cultural consequences in Australia. Recognizing that issues behind Mabo did not develop in isolation, however, Russell also frames his analysis against an international backdrop that includes Canada, New Zealand, and United States and by doing so has produced work that will be of interest to scholars in variety of fields. Russell traces life of Mabo from his time on Murray Island, to his political radicalization--or awakening--on Australian mainland, to his efforts to have land rights of Murray Islanders recognized. Beyond being solely story of Eddie Mabo, islander legal warrior, however, narrative in Recognizing Aboriginal Title also tells the story of imperialism, colonization, and efforts of Indigenous peoples in contemporary period to get out from under colonialism imposed on them by English-settler democracies (p. 10). Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and United States were only four British colonies where English-speaking settlers bec[a]me dominant population both in numbers and in influence of their legal and political traditions (p. 8). Russell shows that Mabo's potentially explosive impact on Australia's sense and understanding of itself stemmed from crucial distinction that it did not share with other European-settler dominated colonies. While Indigenous peoples in all four colonies were subjected to massive dispossession and colonization (p. 117), treaty processes in Canada, New Zealand, and United States implicitly recognized Indians [and Maori] as owners of vast territories 'surrendered' (p. 115). Settler society in Australia, however, believed that before arrival of Europeans, colony had been terra null&s-an uninhabited territory, an empty land. This did not mean uninhabited in truest sense of word-bloody conflicts between settlers and Aborigines over lands and resources punctuated eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries. Rather, Australian settler society believed that land was unoccupied and that Aboriginal land rights did not exist because local Indigenous populations did not exercise (and perhaps were not capable of exercising) sovereign authority over their lands (p. 41) and that they therefore were not fully human (p. 255). Euro-Australians viewed their country as being of one-nation, that is, a political society formed by British settlers which non-British immigrants and native people have been allowed to join (p. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».