MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1502679465 · doi:10.1353/utq.2011.0071

Unsettled Remains: Canadian Literature and the Postcolonial Gothic (review)

2011· article· en· W1502679465 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Terry Goldie

Notice bibliographique

RevueUniversity of Toronto Quarterly · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGothic Literature and Media Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHistoryCriticismLiteratureClassicsPhilosophyArt

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Unsettled Remains: Canadian Literature and the Postcolonial Gothic Terry Goldie (bio) Cynthia Sugars and Gerry Turcotte, editors. Unsettled Remains: Canadian Literature and the Postcolonial Gothic. Wilfrid Laurier University Press. 2009. 324. $42.95 It is a truism that collections of literary criticism are a mixed bag. The editors put out a call, and then whatever comes in comes in. Thus many such collections are at best inconsistent and at worst useless. I am very glad to say this is not the case with Unsettled Remains. Part of the reason, I think, is the editors. I have been to two conferences organized by Turcotte and one by Sugars and I presume that is true of most Canadianists. Their energy at getting us together is second to none. This is no doubt part of the reason they have assembled such an excellent list of contributors for Unsettled Remains. There are a couple that I do not know but many are very familiar names. I would call myself now one of the old guard. Sugars and Turcotte have assembled many of the best of the next generation. In that group I would include Jennifer Andrews, Marlene Goldman, Jennifer Henderson, and Herb Wyile. Of the generation after that, I would certainly include Lindy Ledohowski as a significant new addition. The idea of the gothic is a constant in Canadian literature. In the introduction, Turcotte and Sugars note comments by Margaret Atwood and Robertson Davies about our lack of ghosts but quickly show that Atwood and Davies provide their own contradictions. The central text is of course Margot Northey's The Haunted Wilderness (1976), but the collection notes many others. (I must here thank Brian Johnson's reference to my own Fear and Temptation, which he calls 'his now classic study.' If you last long enough you get to become a classic.) Regardless of that facetious parenthesis, Johnson's reference suggests the methodical scholarship of the collection. Whereas the primary texts are often the obvious suspects, such as Fall on Your Knees for Atef Laouyene and Kiss of the Fur Queen for Jennifer Henderson, the secondary material ranges quite widely, particularly in reference to the ghostly and its analysts, most particularly through Freud and his descendants such as Kristeva. The cover of the book uses Rosalie Favell's photo-montage 'I awoke to find my spirit had returned.' The well-known image from The Wizard of Oz of Dorothy awakening in Kansas with her family around her is reconfigured with Favell's self-portrait as Dorothy. The original photograph includes the wizard in his guise as the travelling salesman peering through the window. Here he is replaced by Louis Riel. This wonderfully resonant figure is reflected in the book's emphasis on indigeneity. As the introduction states, 'The figure of the Indian ghost' is a particular obsession in Canada and so it is in this book. My favourite example here is [End Page 325] Johnson's reconsideration of Farley Mowat, but I readily admit it might be because his work continues the line of mine many years ago, another type of literary ghost. But Henderson looks at Tomson Highway's indigenous ghosts, Wyile those in Michael Crummey's River Thieves, and Andrews those in Eden Robinson's Monkey Beach. The image of Coyote in Goldman's examination of Watson's Double Hook and Gail Anderson-Dargetz's The Cure for Death by Lightning is only a small remove from those spectres. Perhaps Canada's history leaves us inevitably haunted by the restless remnants of invasion. I must admit I have some problems with the various references to 'postcolonial' in the collection: whether gothic or mythic or perhaps Delphic, 'postcolonial' seems much too amenable to a multitude of applications. Still, perhaps this is all too appropriate for a country that remains for all of us at once heimlich und unhemilich. [End Page 326] Terry Goldie Terry Goldie, Department of English, York University Copyright © 2011 University of Toronto Press Incorporated

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,156
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,313

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0120,029
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,005
Communication savante0,0060,004
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0140,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,209
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations21
Publié2011
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUniversity of Toronto QuarterlyMême sujetGothic Literature and Media AnalysisTravaux en français237 207