MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1502867437

Riding the Third Wave: Women-Produced Zines and Feminisms

2002· article· en· W1502867437 sur OpenAlex
Brandi Bell

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueResources for feminist research · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGender, Feminism, and Media
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésFeminismSociologyGender studiesPopular cultureFeminist movementMedia studies
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This paper aims to provide insight into the role women play as cultural producers by examining women-produced zines. Zines (independently-produced magazines) provide an opportunity to explore cultural production by women which is unconstrained by corporate or institutional interests. The form and content of a selection of women-produced are analyzed with reference to third wave feminism. A movement within feminism generally associated with young women, third wave feminism provides a framework in which to examine cultural production by women to determine the possibilities and limitations may provide for feminist action.IntroductionResearch pertaining to North American women's popular culture has typically focussed on the role women play as consumers of cultural products. There is inadequate research concerning women as producers of popular culture and more work needs to be done in this area to better understand the role women play as producers of cultural products. Women's magazines have long been considered important in women's lives and have grown into a large cultural industry around the world. However, like studies of other forms of popular culture, those pertaining to women's magazines have traditionally neglected to consider the role of women as producers.Zines, however, are independently produced magazines that provide an opportunity to explore women's cultural production in a format unconstrained by commercial or organizational restrictions. Zines are an example of how women can create cultural products and they provide insight into the possibilities and limitations for feminist activism in the current North American cultural environment.There has been very little scholarly work that has focussed on the cultural phenomenon of zines. Stephen Duncombe has produced the most comprehensive scholarly look at in his book, Notes From Underground: Zines and the Politics of Alternative Culture. He covers various issues related to the production of zines, its history, and the culture that has grown up around it. And while he briefly touches on women as zine producers, he offers a very limited analysis, focussing solely on coming out of the Riot Grrrl movement. He does address the possible implications of for feminism and opens a gateway to this study by acknowledging the importance of cultural production by women: By producing and networking with each other, Riot Grrrls become producers instead of merely consumers, creating their own spaces rather than living within the confines of those made for them (Duncombe, 1997, p. 70).Very few studies have emerged that examine the relationship of women to zine production. Electronic (or ezines) have more often been the focus for feminist scholars.(1) For the most part, the study of print by women has been neglected by feminist scholars, leaving an important part of women's culture unexamined.Zines and Zine HistoryDefining has been a difficult and highly problematic task. Both scholars and zine creators have struggled in their attempts to define what a zine is, often failing to arrive at a consensus on the issue. Problems arise concerning what characteristics define a zine and differentiate it from a magazine. Typical definitions of focus on their tendency to be noncommercial and amateur, and to have a small range of influence. Other definitions, however, focus on the reasons behind creating a zine, arguing that are created out of a pure desire or need to communicate, as opposed to magazines which may be created in order to make a profit.According to Duncombe, zines are noncommercial, nonprofessional, small-circulation magazines which their creators produce, publish, and distribute by themselves (Duncombe, 1997, p. 6). This definition contains abstract terms that make defining difficult; however, it is a useful definition, not only because it reminds us that there are many contentious issues around defining zines, but also because it points to many of the most common characteristics of zines. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,008
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,724
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,998

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0080,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,002
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,180
Tête enseignante GPT0,391
Écart entre enseignants0,211 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle