MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1503809658

Eastern Dreams: How the Arabian Nights Came to the World (review)

2012· article· en· W1503809658 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Bonnie Irwin

Notice bibliographique

RevueMarvels & Tales · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueFolklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésContext (archaeology)JargonScholarshipHistoryPlot (graphics)LiteratureArtPhilosophyLawArchaeologyPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Eastern Dreams: How the Nights Came to the World. By Paul McMichad Nurse. Toronto: Viking Canada, 201 0. 242 pp. For years, scholars have grappled with the questions of which stories actually constitute the 1001 Arabian Nights and where they originated. In Eastern Dreams, Paul McMichael Nurse follows in the footsteps of British scholar Robert Irwin and tries to untangle these mysteries for a lay audience, translating decades of scholarship into readable, jargon-free prose. Scholars will find little new in this book, but for the general reader and fan of the Nights, Nurse tells a compelling story. Because the questions of origin and provenance of the Nights remain unanswered to this day, despite centuries of speculation, Nurse makes choices about which theories to highlight and which to identify as untenable, but overall his approach is evenhanded. This tactic means, of course, that readers finish the book with no more answers than they started with, but at least the rich context of the mystery has been laid out before them in generous detail. Nurse also embeds synopses of the frame story as well as some of the tales to remind us of the general plot lines. One of the greatest values of this book for the general reader is Nurses discussion of the many analogs to the tales as well as the many sequels, re -imaginings, and paths of influence of the 1001 Nights. More than twenty years after Peter Caracciolo's excellent Nights in Engiish Literature (Macmillan, 1988), Nurse adds many more contemporary authors and texts to the vast list of those influenced by the Nights. He also provides brief discussions of postcolonial descendants of the work, such as Mahfouzs Nights and Days and Salman Rushdies Haroun and the Sea of Stories. Because the sphere of influence of the 1 001 Nights has become so broad, Nurse convincingly makes the case that the work, although clearly Arab in many ways, has also become a classic of world literature. So many literary traditions have taken ownership of some version of the text in one way or another, parented by multinational sires and a Muslim mother - literally, in Scheherazade's case - [that] the Nights may owe at least part of its longevity to its development at a time and a place acting as a crossroads between cultures (49). Nurse maintains, however, that most of this cultural exchange took place in the form of written texts passed back and forth, and he largely discounts the possible oral provenance and dissemination of the stories. And, what indeed, constitutes the 1001 Nights? Although Nurse holds out a note of optimism at the end that we may one day know, the idea of a single, authentic text remains a folly. Nurse clearly prefers the more comprehensive collections based on the Calcutta II manuscript to the more limited ones based on the medieval Syrian manuscript edited by Muhsin Mahdi (1984). Nurses argument is that the identity of the 1001 Nights lies in, at least partly, cal the tales that have been attached to it over the years. Translator Husain Haddawy, recognizing this same situation, followed his excellent translation of Mahdi's edition (1990) with a second volume, The Nights II: Sindbad and Other Popular Tales (1995). For an Nights scholar, the more intriguing parts of Eastern Dreams might very well be where Nurse wanders away from explaining provenance and goes into more creative directions, such as drawing parallels between the Nights and Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire: Or perhaps as literary works, the Nights and Gibbon's Decline and Fall are not as far apart as we might suppose. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,773
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,755

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,037
Tête enseignante GPT0,252
Écart entre enseignants0,215 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMarvels & TalesMême sujetFolklore, Mythology, and Literature StudiesTravaux en français237 207