MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1504170894 · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.04224.x

Multiple Findings in Elderly Adults with Confirmed <scp>A</scp> lzheimer's Disease

2012· letter· en· W1504170894 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hiroyasu Akatsu, Norihiro Ogawa, Takeshi Kanesaka, Chie Taniguchi, Maya Mimuro, Mari Yoshida, Zenjirou Matsuyama, Rina Kurihara, Osamu Kohashi, Akira Hori, Takayuki Yamamoto, Yoshio Hashizume

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2012
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineAutopsyDiseaseDementiaLewy bodyAlzheimer's diseaseCause of deathPediatricsPathologyGerontology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The latest guidelines for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease (AD) that work groups of the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer's Association have developed1 recommend using amyloid positron emission tomography (aPET)2 and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers.3 Because the U.S. Food and Drug Administration requires autopsy analysis as part of its aPET trials, autopsy confirmation is essential for putting together evidence of actual AD features. Because Japanese clinicians and researchers have had a greater opportunity to study the progression of the disease over a longer period because of patient longevity, cases often have combined neuropathological features, which makes it difficult to diagnose the distinct disease entities involved. The Fukushimura Brain Bank was established in 1990 and has published annual reports for longer than a decade.4 In recent years, a large number of cases have been accumulated, and several of the findings have changed the understanding of newly described neurodegenerative diseases affecting elderly adults, especially dementia with Lewy bodies5 and argyrophilic grain disease.6 The 108 cranial autopsies performed from December 2003 to June 2009 included 43 men and 65 women with an age at death of 84 ± 9.1. The majority of patients satisfied diagnostic criteria for more than one disease. Several had multiple types of changes in their brain. Thirty-seven definite AD cases met National Institute on Aging and Reagan criteria for a high7 likelihood of AD, and many of these had another pathology. Non-AD cases were also complicated. Vascular troubles (VT) were encountered the most frequently (64 cases, 59%). Of neurodegenerative diseases, AD pathology was the most common (37 cases, 34%). As a result, AD and VT were often seen together, and several cases had a third pathological feature. None of these cases had a familial history of AD. There were 10 cases of pure AD, without any other pathological change, and these had a significantly younger onset, shown as diamonds (Group (G) 1) in Figure 1. The other 27 cases had a vascular or other neurodegenerative disease. On looking at the relationship between onset age and duration, individuals with AD with VT (G2, G6, and G7) were aged 70 to 90 and had a 5- to 15-year duration, with no correlation observed. In individuals without VT (G1, G3, G4, and G5), there was a negative correlation between these two factors. Individuals with a later onset had a shorter duration and a tendency to develop more complications. When AD developed before the age of 70, it was generally of longer duration and was not accompanied by any other brain disease. The hypothesis is that younger individuals with AD were admitted for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, so they had an early start at a controlled lifestyle, especially with respect to diet, and this nutritional support was maintained even in cases of advanced AD. Consequently, they had a lower risk of cerebrovascular disease and benefited from nutritional support to the end. Nevertheless, it was not possible to determine precisely why these individuals with younger onset and longer duration did not develop other neurodegenerative diseases. There were no cases with an onset at the age of 70 in individuals with AD with VT. Individuals with earlier onset of VT might have severe risk factors that would affect their prognosis, and they might not survive long enough to develop AD. It was learned that onset age and disease duration have an inverse correlation in cases of AD without VT (Figure 1), which means that AD is not a life-threatening disease per se, but the later onset and longer duration of AD has meant that individuals can develop multiple complications, making the clinical diagnosis of AD difficult. Japan is a super-aging society, and dementia, such as AD, is increasing rapidly in the population aged 80 and older. The older the individuals, the greater the risk of developing multiple dementia complexes with unaccountable clinical features. This study was conducted in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. The ethical committee of Fukushimura Hospital approved the study protocol, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants or their relatives (approval number 039; June 2, 2000). Conflict of Interest: This study was supported by a grant from the Japanese Brain Bank Network for Neuroscience Research. The results were submitted for presentation at the Alzheimer's Association International Conference, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, July 14–19, 2012. Author Contributions: All authors participated in study concept and acquisition of data. Sponsor's Role: None.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,008

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0030,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,265
Écart entre enseignants0,253 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society→Même sujetDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research→Travaux en français237 207→