MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1504297220 · doi:10.1111/jgs.13503

Attenuation of Postprandial Hypotension with Acarbose in Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

2015· letter· en· W1504297220 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Kenneth Madden, David Harris, Graydon S. Meneilly

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2015
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Diabetes Association
Mots-clésMedicinePostprandialBlood pressureAcarboseDiabetes mellitusInternal medicinePlaceboCrossover studyOrthostatic vital signsEndocrinology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

To the Editor: Postprandial hypotension (PPH), when systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreases more than 20 mmHg after eating, is a common cause of fainting-induced falls.1 PPH has also been shown to be an independent predictor of mortality in older adults.2 The purpose of the present pilot study was to examine whether blocking carbohydrate intake in the small intestine with acarbose (an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor) would attenuate the postprandial hypotensive response in older adults with diabetes mellitus complicated by PPH. All subjects were aged 65 and older and had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus as defined by current American Diabetes Association guidelines, a normal hematocrit, and normal creatinine.3 Subjects were excluded if they took insulin (because of the known vasoactive effects)4 or had orthostatic hypotension. This study received approval from the human subjects committee of the University of British Columbia, and all subjects provided written informed consent. The study had a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design with allocation concealment. Subjects were examined in a fasting state at 9:30 a.m., and each meal test lasted 90 minutes. All antihypertensive medications were held until after completion of the study that morning. Subjects were given acarbose 50 mg or a placebo immediately before administration of the liquid standardized meal (1,050 kJ; containing 7.8 g fat, 38 g carbohydrates, 9.4 g protein, and 3.4 g fiber; 3.0 ± 0.5°C). Beat-to-beat heart rate measures (three-lead electrocardiogram), blood pressure (Finometer, Finapres Medical Systems BV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and cerebral Doppler (2 MHz TCD probe, Spencer Technologies, Northborough, MA) were sampled at 1,000 Hz. Repeated-measures two-way analysis of variance was used to compare the main effect of time, the main effect of study session, and the interaction term (time by session) for all parameters. Fifteen older adults (six male, nine female; mean age 76 ± 1, range 67–85) were recruited; there were no dropouts. Baseline SBP (128 ± 5 vs 113 ± 5, P = .087), DBP (73 ± 4 vs 67 ± 4, P = .064), and MAP (93 ± 4 and 86 ± 4, P = .08) were not significantly different between the two sessions. Fourteen of the 15 subjects had at least one postprandial hypotensive episode during the placebo session. Subjects had 0.7 (95% confidence interval = 0.1–1.2, bootstrap analysis) fewer PHEs during the acarbose session (0.8 ± 0.2 PHEs, bootstrap analysis) than during the placebo session (1.5 ± 0.3 PHEs, bootstrap analysis). No subjects experienced presyncopal or syncopal symptoms during any of the study sessions. There was an overall significant main effect of time on SBP (P < .001), mean arterial pressure (MAP) (P < .001), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (P < .001), and heart rate (P < .001) during the postprandial period. Subjects had significantly higher postprandial SBP (session, P = .03) and MAP (session, P = .03) during the acarbose session but not for DBP (session, P = .07) or heart rate (P = .69) (Figure 1). The interaction terms for SBP (time by session, P = .22) and MAP (time by session, P = .03) were not significant. Subjects experienced significantly lower systolic (session, P < .02; time by session, P < .001), mean (session, P = .03; time by session, P = .03), and diastolic (session, P < .04; time by session, P = .003) middle cerebral arterial (MCA) velocities during the acarbose session. The difference between the placebo and acarbose sessions tended to widen during the postprandial period, reaching a plateau after 25 minutes. Current therapy for PPH consists of dietary manipulations, which are poorly tolerated and are suboptimal in effectiveness.5 In a small study (n = 9), acarbose attenuated PPH in a young population without diabetes mellitus with severe autonomic failure;6 acarbose also attenuated normal postprandial physiological changes (n = 8) in older adults without PPH.7 The only investigations of acarbose in older adults with PPH were found in case reports.8 To the knowledge of the authors of the current study, this study was the first to demonstrate that a single dose of an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor elevates postprandial blood pressure, resulting in a reduction in the number of PHEs in older adults with PPH. In addition to effects on the postprandial hemodynamic response, acarbose reduced postprandial MCA velocities. MCA velocity is proportional to MCA blood flow and proportional to the inverse of the square of the MCA diameter.9 Given that blood pressures were consistently higher in the postprandial acarbose session, it is likely that acarbose increased MCA diameter through an improvement in the cerebral autoregulatory response, similar to that observed in the peripheral forearm circulation.10 The current study suggests that acarbose might be a useful therapy for PPH in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Conflicts of Interest: None of the authors have relevant conflict of interests to disclose. This research was supported by the Canadian Diabetes Association (OG-3–13–4157). Author Contributions: Madden: protocol design, data collection and analysis, writing the manuscript. Harris: data collection and analysis, editing the manuscript. Meneilly: protocol design, editing the manuscript. The guarantor for this work is Dr. Kenneth Madden. Sponsor's Role: The sponsor had no role in the design, methods, subject recruitment, data collection, analysis, or preparation of the paper.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,483
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,579

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,214
Écart entre enseignants0,207 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations12
Publié2015
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietyMême sujetCardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic DisordersTravaux en français237 207