GENERATIONAL PERSPECTIVES ON SANITATION, HYGIENE, AND MENSTRUAL PRACTICES AMONG PASTORALIST MAASAI GIRLS AND WOMEN IN THE NGORONGORO CONSERVATION AREA, TANZANIA
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objectives: Understanding competing daily pressures and priorities among marginalized females is essential for developing effective health promotion strategies. As part of a broader project focused on partnership establishment with schools and communities to develop culturally relevant and sustainable sanitation and hygiene strategies, this study sought to gain awareness of beliefs and practices among female Maasai pastoralists in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA), Tanzania. Methods: We conducted seven group discussions, each lasting approximately two hours, with female secondary school students and a local women’s group (40 participants). Questions concerning sanitation and hygiene practices investigated crosscutting concerns within access, safety, and privacy for girls and women. The issue of menstrual management was also explored to develop an understanding of past and current practices among pastoralists. Discussions with the women’s group were combined with participatory activities presenting locally relevant strategies to improve sanitation and hygiene, using a BOPPPS (Bridge, Objectives, Pre-Assessment, Participatory, Post-Assessment, Summary) model for workshop delivery. Outcomes: The availability of resources, as well as cultural beliefs and norms, affect daily sanitation and hygiene practises. Key factors include water scarcity, expense of products such as sanitary pads and soap, and heavy workloads expectant of females. Contrary to other literature, menstruation did not impede secondary school attendance in the NCA. Girls attending secondary school placed high importance on scientific information about sanitation and hygiene issues such as hand washing, sanitary pad use, urinary tract infections, and latrines. Elders expressed strong cultural beliefs, which restricted menstruating females from cutting vegetables or preparing alcohol. When there is a lack of water, cloths used for absorption during menstruation are washed in cattle urine. Discussion: The first phase of this pilot study engaged community members in developing our understanding of female specific challenges and practises related to sanitation and hygiene. We noted generational differences with respect to traditional and current hygiene practises, in particular menstrual management. Peer mentorship among schoolgirls originating from urban and rural areas streamlined practises of menstrual hygiene. Further research on generational perspectives of menstruation, sanitation and hygiene is needed to enhance our understanding of obstacles faced by pastoralist women. Ideas for further research include investigating whether girls attending non- boarding secondary schools see menstruation as an impediment for school attendance, and whether sexual assault on females is common when seeking areas for open defecation. Conclusion : A multitude of factors influence sanitation and hygiene practises among pastoralist females in the NCA. In addition to water and resource scarcity, there are also cultural and generational dimensions which affect sanitation and hygiene practises of females, in particular menstrual management. Acknowledgements: Grand Challenges Canada, and the University of Calgary Global Health Program.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».