MARCIA M. GALLO, Different Daughters: A History of the Daughters of Bilitis and the Rise of the Lesbian Rights Movement
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Different Daughters: A History of the Daughters of Bilitis and the Rise of the Lesbian Rights Movement, which won the 2006 Lambda Book Award, is the first book-length exploration of the history, achievements, and underlying tensions of one of North America's most influential lesbian organizations.Marcia M. Gallo's interviews with former group members and extensive use of archival records provide a fascinating portrait of the group's rise and fall.Formed in San Francisco in 1955, the Daughters of Bilitis (pronounced "Bill-EE-tis") (DOB) became an internationally renowned lesbian rights organ ization in the pre-Stonewall era.The group's name was a sly reference to the eponymous lesbian poet in Pierre Lou's Songs of Bilitis, and was chosen on the assumption that only other lesbians would understand it.The DOB was created as a social club by four couples; the organization was intended to provide a safe space for women who were tired of both police harassment and the scrutiny of tourists found in San Francisco's bar scene.However, in a move that would create the first of many internal schisms, founders Del Martin and Phyllis Lyon pushed the DOB to become a politically oriented "homophile" organization in 1956.The group grew slowly but steadily, thanks largely to the newsletter The Ladder; within two years there were local chap ters in New York, Los Angeles, and other urban centres.In 1960, the DOB began sponsoring biennial conventions on issues of importance to gays and lesbians, and these events (which featured mostly sympathetic religious, medical, and legal authorities as guest speakers) garnered a fair amount of media attention.Throughout the late 1950s and early 1960s, the DOB's goals were explicitly assimilationist: members were expected to follow a dress code, and the group strove to promote lesbians as respectable, upstanding citizens yearning for greater inclusion in mainstream society.This strategy came under increasing attack toward the end of the 1960s and the beginning of 1970s, when the confrontational tactics of more radical groups like the Gay Liberation Front made the DOB seem timid and staid by comparison.However, as Gallo illustrates, those subsequent organizations owe a debt to the efforts of groups like the DOB, who faced great risks for their candor in earlier and more conservative times.A major structural reorganization in 1968, loss of The Ladder in 1972, ceaseless infighting, and a growing genera tion gap eventually brought about the DOB's demise, though some local chap ters managed to continue into the early 1990s.Different Daughters keeps issues of race, class, and gender at the fore front.While initially it is somewhat unsettling to read the ethnicity and class background of almost every person introduced, such designations do help the reader understand the group's significance within the larger social context of
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».