MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1504785807

In Breach of Story: Breaking the Shackles of Traditional Fiction

2006· article· en· W1504785807 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ethan Joella

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational fiction review · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueDigital Storytelling and Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPlot (graphics)CraftNarrativeLiteratureFiction writingCreative writingAestheticsHistoryArtVisual arts
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

I have undergone trauma of too many undergraduate creative writing teachers, too many books on craft of stories. Though I am sure all of them have been well intentioned, I am still distressed. In my own writing, time-honored of traditional story have served as shackles confining my creativity. When writing my stories, I have always felt compelled stay one point of view, include that essential epiphany, make story's length substantial, have a linear, causal plot, and see actual events of my story perfunctorily correspond with points on Gustav Freytag's plot structure pyramid. As an artist, I want have entitlement be liberated and limitless my work, yet so many writing courses, anthologies, and craft books, these seemingly indisputable story regulations prevail. After studying numerous authors who defy conventional story standards, I have come realize that option break traditional is always there. And rule breaking or not, experimental stories typically succeed achieving ends similar conventional pieces: concentrated emotional impacts, examinations of universal themes, and fulfillments of implicit contracts between writer and reader. Edgar Allen Poe provided a footing for stories that paved way for future writers of His review of Nathaniel Hawthorne's TwiceTold Tales (1842) is viewed as his theory of fiction. In it he states that special goal of writer of a piece of prose is to create a concentrated emotional impact. This impact, presupposing that writing is of high quality, results directly from succinctness of narrative, which Poe says and should be read a single sitting of perhaps no more than two hours. (1) If early aim, then, of a piece of was achieve aforementioned concentrated emotional impact, manner which writer gets there is of no consequence. In anthology Anti-Story, Philip Stevick states that early part of twentieth century, short challenge[d] received notions of time and space, continuity and coherence, artistic illusion and psychological process just as powerfully and successfully as longer [did]. It puzzle[d] and trouble[d] its readers with its artistic audacity. And it include[d] some of most extraordinary art of our time, as passionate its craftsmanship, as controlled its structure, as penetrating its vision as any art of any kind. But then a kind of fatigue over[took] form, changing into perhaps most conservative art of mid-century, during nineteen-fifties probably single mode of artistic expression most self-imitative. (2) This period can be pinpointed as source of that stifled me and many other creative writing students before and after me. Stevick goes on say how disturbing and ultimately tiresome it is to find so many patterned and rather obvious symbols these English and American works of half century. He points out how few distinct voices there are be found and how in an age which every other art continued extend its own possibilities, became rather predictable and formulaic. (3) Many writers, however, by 1960s, felt liberated try new techniques after torrent of anti-stories. (4) John Gardner refers rules of fiction this way: the search for aesthetic absolutes is a misapplication of writer's energy. When one begins be persuaded that certain things must never be done and that certain other things must always be done, one has entered into first stage of aesthetic arthritis, disease that ends up pedantic rigidity and atrophy of institution. Every true work of art--and thus every attempt at art (since things meant be similar must submit one standard)--must be judged primarily, though not exclusively, by its own laws. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,649
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,766

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,089
Tête enseignante GPT0,400
Écart entre enseignants0,311 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational fiction reviewMême sujetDigital Storytelling and EducationTravaux en français237 207