Teaching & Learning Guide for: Second‐Rate Stories? Changing Approaches to the Anglo‐Saxon Chronicle

Author's Introduction The article provides an overview of the annals known collectively as The Anglo‐Saxon Chronicle , an extensive project of historical writing in English initiated in the late ninth century and continued for some two centuries and in eight manuscript versions. Because of the great complexity of its textual history, and the relative obscurity of its origins, much scholarship on the Chronicle has concentrated on its language – vocabulary and spelling – in an attempt to reconstruct both the relationships of the manuscripts to each other, as well as their putative originals and possible source materials. At the same time, the Chronicle has always been used as a source, in a raw sense, of historical data. This article considers the merits and limitations of both approaches, as well as advocating the value of more recent work that considers the Chronicle itself as a cultural product, which mediates and thereby shapes the perception of events by means of a deliberately restrictive and highly specific idiom. Summarizing the trends of past scholarship and attempting to predict the shape of future work, the article aims both to introduce students to the Anglo‐Saxon Chronicle and to establish the centrality of this text to broader questions about the nature of historical writing. Author Recommends Michael Swanton's The Anglo‐Saxon Chronicles (London: Phoenix, 2000) is the best translation available for those who want to access the texts in Modern English. Following the practice of earlier Chronicle editors and translators such as Plummer and Garmonsway, Swanton provides concurrent annals from different manuscript versions, with A and E providing his main texts. He also includes black and white plates of various Anglo‐Saxon antiquities, as well as maps and genealogical tables. For those who can read Old English, the volumes of the magisterial series The Anglo‐Saxon Chronicle: A Collaborative Edition are essential, since they provide the texts of all the major Chronicle versions in a modern, scholarly format with full annotations and lengthy discussion of the manuscript background, textual relationships, and language: MS A , vol. 3, ed. Janet Bately (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1986); MS B , vol. 4, ed. Simon Taylor (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1983); MS C , vol. 5, ed. Katherine O’Brien O’Keeffe (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2001); MS D , vol. 6, ed. G. P. Cubbin (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 1996); MS E , vol. 7, ed. Susan Irvine (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2004); MS F , vol. 8, ed. Peter S. Baker (Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, 2000). Thomas Bredehoft's Textual Histories: Readings in the Anglo‐Saxon Chronicle (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2001) was the first book‐length study devoted to this text, and is a thought‐provoking, well‐researched and enjoyable read for students and scholars alike, paying admirable attention to manuscript details such as pointing and layout. Alice Sheppard's Families of the King: Writing Identity in the Anglo‐Saxon Chronicle (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004), another book‐length study, considers the Chronicle not just as a repository of historical detail, but as a nationalizing text containing shaped narratives of kin and lordship. No scholar has done more to advance our understanding of the Anglo‐Saxon Chronicle , and particularly the relationships among the manuscript versions and the use of source material, than Janet Bately. Essential reading in order to understand the complex textual history of the Chronicle includes: Janet Bately, ‘The Compilation of the Anglo‐Saxon Chronicle, 60 BC to AD 890: Vocabulary as Evidence’, Proceedings of the British Academy 64 (1978): 93–129; ‘World History in the Anglo‐Saxon Chronicle: Its Sources and its Separateness from the Old English Orosius’, Anglo‐Saxon England 8 (1979): 177–94; ‘Bede and the Anglo‐Saxon Chronicle ’, in Saints, Scholars and Heroes: Studies in Medieval Culture in Honour of Charles W. Jones (Collegeville, MN: Hill Monastic Manuscript Library, 1979), 233–54; ‘The Compilation of the Anglo‐Saxon Chronicle Once More’, Leeds Studies in English 16 (1985): 7–26; ‘Manuscript Layout and the Anglo‐Saxon Chronicle’, John Rylands University Library Bulletin 70 (1988): 21–43; The Anglo‐Saxon Chronicle: Texts and Textual Relationships (Reading: Reading Medieval Studies Monograph, 1991). Online Materials A manuscript image of annals 824–33 from the C‐text of the Chronicle may be viewed at http://www.bl.uk/onlinegallery/themes/histtexts/angsaxchron.html . You can hear R. D. Fulk reading the poetic entry for annal 937 of the Chronicle at http://www.wwnorton.com/college/english/nael/noa/audio.htm . This poem, known as The Battle of Brunanburh , which employs heroic diction and a traditional verse form, commemorates Æþelstan of Wessex's victory against a combined force of Picts, Irish, and Norsemen. The Chronicle is not the only formulaic historical text in Anglo‐Saxon England, although it is arguably the most wide‐ranging in its focus, as well being the most self‐aware of its identity as a historical and national text. Charters are a related form, sharing with the Chronicle a highly formulaic diction (albeit generally in Latin), a focus on territorial tenure and exchange, and the function of recording details of persons and events. Translations of the charters are available at: http://www.trin.cam.ac.uk/kemble/pelteret/2%20Index.htm . Sample Syllabus The Textuality of Medieval Culture Course Description This course will explore, in a broad and interdisciplinary manner, the various influences and aspects of textuality in medieval English culture both early and late. We will investigate the question of what constitutes a ‘text’ in a manuscript culture in which scribes customarily and substantively altered the texts they copied; in which the beginnings and ends of individual works were not graphically marked;

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.