Proceedings of the joint ACM SIGSOFT conference -- QoSA and ACM SIGSOFT symposium -- ISARCS on Quality of software architectures -- QoSA and architecting critical systems -- ISARCS
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It is our great pleasure to welcome you to the Seventh International ACM SIGSOFT Conference on the of Software Architectures -- QoSA 2011 and the 2nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Architecting Critical Systems -- ISARCS 2011. The goal of QoSA (Quality of Software Architectures) is to address aspects of software architecture focusing on quality characteristics and how these relate to the design of software architectures. Specific issues of interest are defining quality measures, evaluating and managing architecture quality, linking architecture to requirements and implementation, and preserving architecture quality throughout the lifetime of the system. Past themes for QoSA include Research into Practice -- Reality and Gaps (2010), Architectures for Adaptive Software Systems (2009), and Models and Architecture (2008). At QoSA 2011, researchers discussed approaches to quality evaluation and management that address different stages of the software life cycle, such as requirements, design, implementation, testing and maintenance following QoSA's theme Quality throughout the Software Lifecycle. ISARCS 2011 is the second edition of a new symposium in the area of architectural design for dependable, safe and secure systems. ISARCS focuses on both theory and practice for architecting critical systems. Architecting such systems faces the big challenge of guaranteeing both the perceived and objective dependability and security, even if accepting service degradation. This requires trade-off among the various attributes of dependability and security that cannot be considered in isolation. The present edition sees contributions on architecting safe and secure systems in different application domains. QoSA and ISARCS have been organized as part of the federated event CompArch, a series of federated events on Component-based Software and Software Architecture. In addition to QoSA 2011 and ISARCS, CompARch 2011 includes CBSE 2011, the 14th International ACM Sigsoft Symposium on Component Based Software Engineering and WCOP 2011, the 16th International Workshop on Component-Oriented Programming. CompArch 2011 was co-located with WICSA 2011 (9th Working International Conference on Software Architecture). We had a great cooperation with WICSA organizers, the general chair Raghu Sangwan, the PC chairs Patricia Lago and Rich Hilliard and Industry Chair Olaf Zimmermann. CompArch and WICSA were fortunate to have four prominent keynote speakers. Pamela Zave (AT&T Laboratories - Research, USA) and Bran Selic (Malina Software Corp.) gave the conference keynotes, and Ian Gorton (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory) and Michael Stal (Siemens Research and Technologies) the Industry Day keynotes.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle