A study of C - repeat binding factors (CBF) associated with low temperature tolerance locus in winter wheat.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Winter wheat has several advantages over spring varieties, higher (25 % more) yield, efficient use of spring moisture, reduction of soil erosion by providing ground cover during the fall and early spring, rapid initial spring growth to out - compete weeds and circumvent the peak of Fusarium head blight infections by flowering early. Winter wheat is planted in early autumn when it germinates and developing seedlings acclimate to cold. The crown survives under snow cover and in spring rapidly grows into a vigorously growing plant for grain to be harvested in summer. However, the harsh Canadian prairie winters require that winter wheat has increased cold hardiness and improved winter survival to reduce losses from sudden cold snaps during winter and spring. Low temperature (LT) tolerance is one of the major components of cold hardiness. Genetic mapping studies have revealed a major quantitative trait locus (Fr-A2) at wheat chromosome 5A which can explain at least 50 % of LT tolerance in wheat. Physical mapping of 5A LT QTL in a hardy winter wheat cv Norstar revealed a cluster of at least 23 C - repeat binding factors (CBF) coinciding with peak of Fr-A2 QTL. The objective of this study is biochemical, and molecular characterization of CBF co - located at Fr-A2 to identify key CBF participating in conferring LT tolerance in winter wheat. A comparative analysis of CBF gene cluster at the Fr-A2 collinear region among Poaceae members showed an expansion in the number of CBF genes with increased LT tolerance. Rice, a cold sensitive member, had only three CBF genes, whereas cold hardy winter wheat cv Norstar has 23 CBF genes. Amino acid sequence - based cluster analysis of complete CBF genes, or their major functional components such as the AP2 - DNA binding domain and C - terminal trans - activation domain, divide Norstar CBF into Pooideae specific clades. However, analyses of Norstar CBF amino acid sequences of different functional groups revealed a shift in clade members. These results suggest divergence of CBF functions which could lead to possible differences / similarity in the regulon activated by a CBF in a specific group. The 15 CBF genes from winter wheat cv Norstar were expressed in E. coli to produce recombinant TrxHisS - CBF fusion proteins in adequate quantities for structural and functional assays. All CBF fusion proteins could be recovered in the E. coli soluble phase of cell extract, except that the CBF17.0 fusion protein could only be recovered with 6 M urea extraction. Eleven of the 15 CBF fusion proteins were very stable in heat (98 oC), 10 % SDS and 6 M urea treatment. The five other CBF members were very labile under native conditions, but were stable in E. coli cell extracts or when extracted under denaturing conditions. Most of the CBF recombinant proteins in denaturing gel electrophoresis migrated slower than expected from their predicted molecular mass, based on amino acid sequence. The slow migration could be associated to their elongated protein structure as determined by dynamic light…
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».