MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1512755099 · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1819.2012.02375.x

Hyperactive sexual desire in Klinefelter Syndrome: Treatment with sertraline

2012· letter· en· W1512755099 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Preeti Sinha, Pratheesh Pozhekkadavil Jnanaprakasan, Chittaranjan Andrade

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences · 2012
Typeletter
Langueen
DomainePsychology
ThématiqueSexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHypomaniaPsychologyKlinefelter syndromeGynecomastiaPsychiatrySexual desireHypoactive sexual desire disorderParaphiliaPediatricsMedicineMoodClinical psychologyHuman sexualityManiaBipolar disorderInternal medicineSexual behavior

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

KLINEFELTER SYNDROME (KS) is the commonest sex chromosome disorder and 47,XXY is the commonest karyotype.1 Hypoactive sexual desire due to hypogonadism is frequent in KS patients.1,2 We report a KS patient who, despite hypogonadism, had hyperactive sexual desire which markedly interfered with social and academic functioning. The sexually adverse effect of sertraline was successfully recruited in his management. The patient gave the authors written informed consent to publish this letter. M., a 22-year-old man, reported poor academic performance. He had earlier been diagnosed with 47,XXY KS. His phenotype was classical: he was tall, with narrow shoulders, broad hips, gynecomastia, and micro-orchidism. Enquiry elicited progressively increasing sexual desire from puberty, manifesting as sexual fantasizing and watching pornography for several hours a day, masturbating 1–5 times a day, and visiting prostitutes 3–4 times a week. He enjoyed these sexual activities, did not consider them abnormal and could not abstain for even a day; although he admitted that they were excessive. The phenomena were not resisted, and did not meet criteria for obsessive–compulsive symptomatology. The time-consuming sexual behaviors interfered with his studies, and he was expelled from his university. He had heterosexual orientation. There was no history of childhood sexual abuse or environmental triggers for the sexual preoccupations. There was no anxiety or mood disturbance, neither depression nor hypomania–mania. There was no history of substance use, including tobacco and alcohol. His IQ was 114. His language and social development were adequate. In non-academic matters, he was independent and self-reliant. Two years earlier, he had been evaluated in Canada for his gynecomastia and micro-orchidism, then diagnosed as having KS and had been advised intramuscular testosterone (200 mg every 2 weeks) to prevent hormonal complications of hypogonadism. Treatment partially reduced gynecomastia but had no other benefit. He fulfilled Kafka criteria for hypersexual disorder.3 With his consent, he was started on sertraline (100 mg/day) as decreased libido is a known adverse effect of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRI);4 testosterone was continued because, despite testosterone replacement, the peak and trough testosterone levels were low normal (300 and 200 ng/dL, respectively). Four weeks later, he reported decreased sexual desire, fantasies, masturbation, and use of pornography; and his concentration on studies had improved. Sertraline was uptitrated to 150 mg/day and, 6 months later, he reported substantial reduction in sexual preoccupation, and improved academic grades. KS is unusual here because, despite hypogonadism requiring testosterone replacement, our patient had puberty-onset hyperactive sexual desire causing clinical impairment. We cannot say with confirmation that KS is responsible for hypersexuality in this case, but we could not find other possible causes in the form of obsessive–compulsive disorder, addiction, autism or mood disorder, and the condition started well before testosterone replacement. We recruited a known SRI adverse effect (decreased sexual drive) to reduce sexual preoccupations and behaviors and thereby improve his ability to focus on studies, an issue for which he had sought clinical assistance. Sertraline, at 150 mg/day, was effective and well accepted.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,294
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,095
Tête enseignante GPT0,403
Écart entre enseignants0,308 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatry and Clinical NeurosciencesMême sujetSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyTravaux en français237 207