<i>Ethnic Federalism: The Ethiopian Experience in a Comparative Perspective</i>, David Turton, ed.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Ethnic Federalism: The Ethiopian Experience In a Comparative Perspective John T. Ishiyama Turton, David , ed. 2006. Ethnic Federalism: The Ethiopian Experience in a Comparative Perspective. Oxford: James Curry. 246 pp. $49.95 (cloth); $24.95 (paper). This book is quite interesting, and a rather welcome addition to the literature on the effects of federalism on ethnic politics. Federalism has long been viewed as a potential institutional remedy for ethnic conflict, but relatively little work in the extant literature has examined the Ethiopian case. Indeed, as the introductory chapter of the book rightly points out, although Ethiopia has gone further than any other state in the world in using ethnicity as a fundamental organizing principle of government, there is scant literature that systematically compares the case of Ethiopia with other cases of federalism. This book—a product of the seminar "Ethnic federalism: The challenges for Ethiopia," held at Addis Ababa University in April 2004—attempts to fill this gap. Its basic aim is to bring a timely comparative perspective to the discussion of Ethiopian federalism. The seminar, and the book itself, were framed by three basic assumptions: first, there is currently no alternative to some form of political federalism in Ethiopia; second, when compared to the past, the restructuring of Ethiopia as an ethnic federation has been an undeniable success; third, that despite this success, the main challenges for Ethiopian federalism lie ahead. The book is really divided into two major sections. The first sets up the comparative framework, which includes an introductory chapter by Turton, which skillfully integrates the themes in the book, as well as a fine general theoretical chapter by Will Klymicka. Setting the tone for the volume, Klymicka compares the African experience with that of the West, and notes that the Western embrace of multinational federalism, as exhibited in Belgium, Canada, and more recently in the UK, has been promoted by two conditions: first, the "desecuritization" of ethnic relations in the West (i.e., there is no fear among ruling elites that national minorities will collaborate with potential external aggressors in their own region), and second, the widespread western consensus on liberal democratic values that cut across ethnic divisions. These conditions are absent in Ethiopia, where ethnic groups are often linked with external threats, such as Somalia and the Ogaden region; however, Klymicka acknowledges that ethnically based federalism was the [End Page 144] only solution that could accommodate the political situation in Ethiopia in the early 1990s and keep the country together. Nevertheless, the absence of the conditions of desecuritization and liberal democratic values means that federalism is likely to be forced in Ethiopia as opposed to evolve naturally from democratic politics. In addition to these introductory chapters, there are two case studies of non-Western federal states, India and Nigeria, and discussions on how Ethiopia may learn from their experiences. In the chapter on Nigeria, Rotimi Suberu does an excellent job of contrasting the federal experience in Nigeria with the Ethiopian model, noting, in particular, that the Nigerian experience is quite different, because Nigerian authorities never sought to draw federal boundaries of states to correspond with ethnic divisions. Indeed, in Nigeria, boundaries were often drawn specifically not to correspond with ethnic divisions. In contrast, the second comparative case study, on India, by Rajeev Bhargava, focuses almost entirely on how the Indian case is unique in the world, and says little about Ethiopia. In brief concluding remarks, Bhargava lists lessons that might be derived from the Indian case, perhaps most notably that federalism is intimately part of a larger democratic process, and suggests that democratization must accompany the further development of Ethiopian federalism. The second section of the book is devoted to the specific challenges facing Ethiopian federalism today: contradictory images of federalism and interethnic group relations in Ethiopian history (Merera Gudina), the tension between theory and practice and political decentralization in Ethiopian federalism (Assefa Fiseha), and the application of local languages under the current federal structure (Gideon Cohen). The last two chapters focus on the management of Ethiopian federalism at the regional level in the Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People's Region (SNNPR), by Sarah Vaughn, and in Gambela (by Dereje Fiyessa). Finally, in...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».