MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1514161001 · doi:10.1111/j.2042-3306.2011.00436.x

Dedication to Professor G. Barrie Edwards

2011· article· en· W1514161001 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. S. Mair, C. J. PROUDMAN

Notice bibliographique

RevueEquine Veterinary Journal · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueBotanical Research and Chemistry
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLibrary sciencePublishingWhite (mutation)MedicinePolitical scienceLawBiologyComputer science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This Equine Veterinary Journal supplement on colic is being published in association with the 10th International Equine Colic Research Symposium. The 1st Equine Colic Research Symposium was held at the University of Georgia in 1982, with the goal of creating a forum where clinicians and researchers could present current research on colic, thereby stimulating discussion and generating new ideas and new research. Since the first meeting in 1982, the Symposium has become truly international with BEVA and AAEP alternately hosting the meeting every 3–4 years. The 10th International Colic Research Symposium is being held in Indianapolis, Indiana, 26–28th July 2011, and is being hosted by the AAEP Foundation. Recent symposia have been complemented by supplements or special issues of Equine Veterinary Journal, publishing full peer reviewed articles on colic, many of which are appearing as papers in the Symposium. In this way, the research presented at the meeting is disseminated to the widest international audience. The success of the Colic Research Symposia is dependant on numerous individuals and sponsors, including the organising committee. The membership of the committee has changed over the years, but the contribution of several individual members who have recently or are about to retire merits recognition. These individuals include Professor Sandy Love (University of Glasgow), who retired after the previous symposium, and Professors Nat White (Marion DuPont Equine Medical Center, Virginia Tech) and Jim Moore (University of Georgia), who will retire after the forthcoming symposium. The contributions of these individuals have been considerable, and we thank them for their dedication and effort that have done so much to make the symposia successful. This supplement has been made possible by the generous financial support of The Horse Trust, specifically the Echo Memorial Fund. This fund, established to ‘make colic history,’ was set up in memory of ‘Echo’ (top left) a police horse injured in the Hyde Park bombing in central London in 1982. Although Echo recovered well from his injuries and lived a happy retirement at the Horse Trust premises in Buckinghamshire, his later life was plagued with recurrent colic episodes. We are delighted that The Horse Trust has chosen to use these funds, donated for use in the battle against equine colic, to support this publication. Echo (left) and Yeti, both injured in the Hyde Park bombing in London in 1982. In 1982, horses injured in the Hyde Park bombing were referred to the Royal Veterinary College for treatment under the expert supervision of Professor Barrie Edwards CBE, BVSc, DVetMed, FRCVS (bottom left), who was also instrumental in the development of the Echo Memorial Fund. Sadly Barrie, a regular and much-respected contributor to the Colic Research Symposia, died shortly before this supplement went to press. Internationally recognised and frequently referred to as the ‘doyen of colic surgeons’ in the UK, Barrie Edwards was an outstanding clinician, surgeon and teacher who was an inspiration and role model for numerous young veterinary surgeons. Since the 1960s he was at the forefront of colic surgery, and his numerous, practical publications on the subject (many containing drawings produced by Barrie himself) are frequently referred to by young and aspiring surgeons. It is with great humility that this supplement is dedicated to Barrie's memory. Gwilym Barrie Edwards CBE, BVSc, DVetMed, FRCVS (20th May 1938–16th May 2011).

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,006
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,106
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,353

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0060,041
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0050,003
Science ouverte0,0020,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,009
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,1060,078

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,110
Tête enseignante GPT0,297
Écart entre enseignants0,186 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEquine Veterinary JournalMême sujetBotanical Research and ChemistryTravaux en français237 207