MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1515646778 · doi:10.5772/13997

Fast Gas Chromatography and Its Use in Pesticide Residues Analysis

2011· book-chapter· en· W1515646778 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueInTech eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiquePesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
Mots-clésPesticide residuePesticideFood safetyAcceptable daily intakeAgricultureEuropean unionToxicologyEnvironmental scienceBusinessAgricultural scienceEnvironmental protectionChemistryGeographyAgronomyBiologyFood scienceInternational trade

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Pesticides have been worldwide used for the protection of food crops against pests and diseases. It is common that residues of these pesticides occur in food products, especially agricultural commodities. Adverse effects on human health of pesticides residues remaining in food after they are applied to food crops are generally known. Possible health risk due to pesticide residues in the diet has deeply modified the strategy for the crop protection, with emphasis on food quality and safety. The widespread concern for the health of society led to the strict regulation of maximum residue limits (MRLs) of pesticide residues in food commodities. There are various organizations that set maximum residue limits (MRLs), such as European Commission (EC), Codex Alimentarius or national governments in Australia, Canada, Japan, USA, etc. Individual limits for different active substance per food commodity combinations are being set by EC within the range of 0.0008-50 mg.kg -1 (Directive 91/414/EEC). Newly discovered ecotoxicological problems, particularly the knowledge on endocrine disrupting effects Analysis close to these levels corresponds to the ultratrace analysis. This calls for urgent attention in two areas: (a) legislative requirements continuously decreasing the maximum acceptable concentration levels in food, and (b) the apparent importance of methods development in the area of pesticide residues analysis. The urgent requirement for low-level analyses promotes also contribution to the science -in the field of separation methods for ultra-trace analysis of organic pollutants in complex mixtures. The method development heads to speeding up the analysis (what leads to reduction of financial demands) while preserving the efficiency of conventional approaches or getting even better efficiency. In pesticide residues analysis additionally there is ever increasing interest to analyse as many analytes as possible in a single analysis. In the case of semivolatile pesticide residues analysis gas chromatography (GC) still plays an important role. Scientifically valid methods for the analysis at low concentration levels are currently still often very close to limits of detections (LODs). The most efficient approach to pesticide analysis involves the use of multiclass, multiresidue methods (MRMs). The sample preparation procedure should be taken into consideration together with the chromatographic analysis and detection in many aspects, mainly in limit of quantifications (LOQs) and selectivity. In multiresidue pesticides analysis used for an inspection of the www.intechopen.com Pesticides -Strategies for Pesticides Analysis 132 presence and/or violation of MRLs in a great number of pesticide residues, usually several chromatographic runs are necessary for qualitative and quantitative analyses. Positive samples exceeding the MRLs value require a subsequent confirmation. Nowadays, the use of mass spectrometry as universal detection method that has identification capability with mass spectral information and high selectivity with extracted ion trace or selected ion monitoring seems to become indispensable for identification purposes. Gas chromatography -mass spectrometry (GC-MS) with electron ionization (EI) and the combination of liquid chromatography (LC) with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) using electrospray ionization (ESI) are identified as techniques most often applied in multiresidue methods for pesticides at present For GC-amenable semivolatile pesticides GC methods are still preferred over LC (liquid chromatography) methods due to higher resolution. After a major advance of recent years in ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS), which have been demonstrated to reliably quantify and identify hundreds of pesticides in less than 10 min Especially fast GC techniques satisfy the present-day demands on faster and cost-effective analysis Analysis time and the cost are the most important aspects that should be considered in the choice of analytical method in routine application. This contribution is devoted to the fast gas chromatography in pesticide residues analysis. Classification according to the GC speeding-up strategies is mentioned and the main part of the chapter is devoted to the fast GC in the analysis of pesticide residues with the use of narrow-bore columns (internal diameter I.D. <0.2 mm). Specificity of pesticide residues analysis as well as problems associated with analysis of pesticides in general are discussed. Sample preparation mainly from the point of view of time requirements and feasibility for fast GC is briefly outlined. Special attention to the selectivity enhancement by the negative chemical ionization approach is devoted. Applicability of fast GC for pesticide residues in real-life samples is demonstrated.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,589
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,225
Écart entre enseignants0,190 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle