MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1516326673 · doi:10.5772/15124

Simulating a Land Development Planning Process through Agent-Based Modeling

2011· book-chapter· en· W1516326673 sur OpenAlexafffundabout
Michael Kieser, J. Danielle

Notice bibliographique

RevueInTech eBooks · 2011
Typebook-chapter
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueLand Use and Ecosystem Services
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Calgary
Mots-clésUrban sprawlGeographyPopulationPopulation growthUrban planningNet migration rateJurisdictionEnvironmental planningEconomic growthPolitical scienceDemographyEngineeringSociologyEconomicsCivil engineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

IntroductionLike most urban centers in North America, the City of Calgary has been experiencing steady population and unprecedented land-cover growth over the past six decades due to the strong Alberta economy, natural increase, and net migration (City of Calgary 2009).Between 1951 and 1961 the population exploded by 93% from 129,060 to 249,641 inhabitants and the city's jurisdiction swelled by 276% from 104 to 392 km 2 .In each decade since, the population has increased by approximately 35% to the current population of 1,043,000 inhabitants and the city's municipal lands have expanded by 14% to the current area of 745 km 2 (Applied History Research Group 1997-2001; City of Calgary 2008).The City of Calgary's " Population Picture" predicts a population of 1.6 million by 2037 and just fewer than two million inhabitants by the 22 nd century (City of Calgary 2009).If these population predictions are correct and planning and land development decisions continue to be made based on current planning policy and developers' self-interest, the City of Calgary will continue to sprawl and housing costs will continue to climb.This competition and cost increase for land within the City of Calgary force young families unable to afford a house in the city to purchase outside of the city and commute to their place of employment.It also encourages retirees wanting to get away from the city to move out to the country.This creates demands on towns located in the vicinity of Calgary to accommodate this net migration.This is the case for the Town of Strathmore, located at about 40 km east of Calgary on the Trans-Canada Highway.It currently has a population of 11,335 inhabitants and covers approximately 15.5 km 2 .The population is expected to reach 56,731 inhabitants by 2056 and to cover 26.8 km 2 , an increase of 38% in population and 12% in area per decade (Brown and Associates Planning Group 2008).Several environmental, social and economic problems are associated to population growth, including: (a) increased demand on and cost for resources such as land and water; (b) increased intensity of use on and competition for land; (c) change in settlement patterns; (d) increased interaction, and conflict or required cooperation with adjacent municipalities; (e) increased demand on existing infrastructure, such as roads, utility distribution, collection and treatment facilities; (f) increased cost for new infrastructure like roads, utilities, schools, and other community facilities; (g) increased environmental ground, water and air pollution; and (h) increased health and emergency costs.Some of these costs can be avoided; www.intechopen.comSimulating a Land Development Planning Process through Agent-Based Modeling 417 more decisions.First, the landowner and/ or developer attend a pre-application meeting with the city planning authority to discuss the proposed redesignation.Then, the landowner/ developer voluntarily presents the plan to the neighbours and local community association.The landowner/ developer submits the application for land-use redesignation and outline plan that he has worked on with professional planning and engineering consultants and sub-consultants, to the planning authority.Then, the application is circulated to the various City departments, the community association, the Alderman, and any applicable special interest groups and a notice is posted.The various planning authorities review the application and the comments and make a recommendation to City Council.Notices are sent to adjacent owners, a sign is posted, and an advertisement is placed in the local newspapers regarding a public hearing on the application.Finally, the proposed land-use redesignation and outline plan application are presented in a public hearing and the City Council makes its decision.As one can see, this process involves many stakeholders including: the landowners, the developers and their engineering and planning consultants, the city/ town authorities and their various departments, the neighbours and other citizens, the community associations, the city/ town political figures, the utility providers, and other special interest groups.One can imagine each stakeholder or group of stakeholders having different visions, opinions and interest in the proposed development.The authorities must also have in mind the broader picture and overall goals of the city/ town itself, and attempt to see how the proposed land development fits into the future plans of the community.Throughout the process, communication occurs between different stakeholders on many occasions, both within an organization and with other organizations.Communication also occurs at many formal and informal levels, including: pre-application meetings with city/ town authorities, meetings with neighbours and community associations, meetings with private planning and engineering firms, open houses, application reviews by authorities and the public, decisions by city/ town authorities, public hearings, and possible appeals.Prior to these communication sessions, stakeholders are trying to devise ways to fit their goals into the proposed development.During the sessions, negotiations take place to balance goals and resolve issues and hopefully make decisions.As stakeholders make decisions, they might weigh social need, environmental impact, economic advantages or disadvantages and political support or opposition of a proposed land development.Municipal and inter-municipal planners use various methods and tools to create a municipal plan that best suits the ideals, values and vision of the community in terms of future social need, economic feasibility, and environmental sustainability.These methods include forecasting based on present conditions using historical data, past success and failures.Some of the tools include statistical census analyses, and community economic models to predict employment creation.The growth plans and planning policy developed for a municipality set the direction of the community growth, which may leave limited choice for developers and citizens.One of the outcomes, which is the focus of this research, is a decision that changes land use allowing for development to occur on a particular parcel of land.Despite the array of methods and tools available, these decisions are still often made in the face of uncertainty.The central issue addressed here is that town planners have a limited, although improving, ability to forecast the cumulative effect of individual decisions made by stakeholders having different goals on the overall environment over which they How to referenceIn order to correctly reference this scholarly work, feel free to copy and paste the following:

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: Simulation ou modélisation
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,065
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,129

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,059
Tête enseignante GPT0,259
Écart entre enseignants0,201 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2011
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInTech eBooksMême sujetLand Use and Ecosystem ServicesTravaux en français237 207